IDIOMS, COLLOCATIONS, METAPHORS, AND PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS: DEFINITIONS, CLASSIFICATIONS, AND PEDAGOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
phraseology, idioms, collocations, metaphors, phraseological units, semantic opacity, compositionality, fixed expressions, cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphor, lexical competence, pedagogical linguistics, cross-linguistic analysis,Abstract
This article examines the linguistic distinctions and interrelationships among idioms, collocations, metaphors, and phraseological units in English. Drawing on contemporary phraseological and cognitive linguistic theories, it analyzes their semantic, structural, and functional characteristics. The study also discusses pedagogical implications for higher education, emphasizing the role of phraseological competence in developing fluency, pragmatic awareness, and culturally appropriate language use.
Downloads
References
1.Cowie, A. P. (1998). Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications. Oxford University Press.
2.Fernando, C. (1996). Idioms and idiomaticity. Oxford University Press.
3.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
4.Yaxshimurotovna, S. Y. (2026). INTEGRATED STUDY OF AUTOMATED TRANSLATION QUALITY AND PHRASEOLOGICAL EQUIVALENCE IN ENGLISH-UZBEK TRANSLATION. Shokh Articles Library, 1(1), 1044-1050.
5.Yaxshimurotovna, S. Y. (2025). CULTURAL-CONNOTATIVE FEATURES OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES AND THEIR INTERPRETATION THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. SHOKH LIBRARY, 1(13). Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India