CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH THE COMPONENT «HEART»

Authors

  • Valieva Nargizakhon Zamir kizi Trainee Teacher Uzbekistan State World Languages University Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

phraseological units, conceptual integration theory, heart metaphor, cross-cultural comparison, English, Russian, Uzbek, metaphorical expressions, emotional expression, cultural values, cognitive linguistics.

Abstract

This study explores the conceptual integration of phraseological units with the component "heart" in English, Russian, and Uzbek, using conceptual integration theory (CIT) as the analytical framework. The research aims to analyze how the metaphor of the "heart" is conceptualized across these three languages, highlighting both universal and culture-specific aspects. By examining a selection of phraseological units, the study identifies key patterns in how the heart metaphor is used to express emotions such as love, kindness, pain, and resilience. While all three languages share common uses of the heart metaphor, they exhibit distinct conceptual integration patterns shaped by cultural values. In English, emotional openness and vulnerability are emphasized, while Russian phrases focus on emotional control and endurance, and Uzbek expressions highlight emotional transparency and directness. This comparative analysis reveals how language reflects cultural attitudes toward emotion, social interaction, and personal expression. The findings suggest that understanding metaphorical expressions in different languages can improve cross-cultural communication, translation, and language teaching. The study also highlights the potential of CIT in uncovering deeper cognitive and cultural processes in metaphor formation. Further research could expand the scope to include additional languages and explore other metaphorical expressions to deepen our understanding of cross-cultural metaphors and conceptual integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ashurova, D. U., Galieva M.R. (2018). Cognitive Linguistics. Tashkent.

2. Dalieva, M.Kh. (2024). Cognitive models of polysemy of linguistic terms. Catalog of monographs, 1, 1-153.

3. Dzhusupov, N.M. (2011). Cognitive stylistics: current state and topical research issues. Problems of cognitive linguistics, 3, 65-76.

4. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science, 22 (2), 133-187.

5.Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces. Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge University Press.

6.Galieva, M.R. (2010). Verbalization of the conceptual sphere Word/Сўз/Слово in the English, Uzbek, Russian language pictures of the world. PhD thes. in phil. Tashkent.

7. Kubryakova, E.S. Demyankov, V.Z. Pankrats, Yu.G. & Luzina, L. G. (1996). Brief dictionary of cognitive terms. Мoscow.

8. Kunin, A.V. (1984). English-Russian Phraseological Dictionary. Russian Language.

9. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

10.Valieva, N. (2025). VERBALIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES THROUGHENGLISH IDIOMS. FILOLOGIYA MASALALARI (MAGISTRATURA), 1(M1), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.36078/987656112

Downloads

Published

2025-04-02

How to Cite

CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS WITH THE COMPONENT «HEART». (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(2), 569-575. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2557

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.