EFFECTIVE METHODS FOR CONDUCTING SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS THROUGH VIRTUAL LABORATORIES IN GENERAL EDUCATION SCHOOLS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The integration of virtual laboratories into general education schools has transformed the way science experiments are conducted. Virtual laboratories provide a safe, flexible, and interactive environment for students to engage in scientific exploration, promoting conceptual understanding, critical thinking, and collaborative skills. They enable the simulation of complex or hazardous experiments that may be impractical in traditional laboratory settings, while also supporting individualized learning and real-time assessment of students’ procedural and analytical skills. Effective implementation requires teacher training, technological infrastructure, and alignment with curriculum standards. Overall, virtual laboratories enhance science education by making it more accessible, engaging, and reflective, preparing students for both academic and real-world scientific challenges.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308.
2.Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38(3), 1–24.
3.Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.
4.Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237.
5.Olimov, T. H. (2019). SPIRITUAL AND MORAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMATION OF CIVIL CULTURE IN FUTURE SPECIALISTS OF HIGHER EDUCATION. Theoretical & Applied Science, (12), 662-665.
6.Olimov, T. H. (2020). The image of a modern teacher in the formation of civic culture among future highly educated specialists. Pedagogical skill-Bukhara, 5.
7.Olimov, T. H. (2019). Development issues of civil society and culture in the work of Eastern thinkers. Pedagogical skill-Bukhara, 2.
8.Olimov, T. H. (2016). Formation of self-awareness in youth. Social and humanitarian sciences in the educational system.-Tashkent, 4.
9.Olimov, T. (2020). BO’LAJAK OLIY MA’LUMOTLI MUTAXASISLARDA FUQAROLIK MADANIYATINI SHAKLLANTIRISHNING AYRIM YO’NALISHLARI. FAN, TA'LIM VA AMALIYOTNING INTEGRASIYASI, 1(1), 20-27.
10.Akbarovna, I. S. (2024). PSIXOLOGIK XIZMAT ASOSLARI. PSIXOLOGIYA VA SOTSIOLOGIYA ILMIY JURNALI, 2(4), 54-60.
11.Akbarovna, I. S. (2023). O'smirlarda destruktiv axborotlarga nisbatan mafkuraviy immunitet shakllantirish.
12.Икромова, С. А. (2024). ЭТАПЫ ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ КОНСУЛЬТАЦИИ. Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 4(3), 875-881.