INTERACTIVE SIMULATORS USED IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS TODAY

Main Article Content

Khaydarov Orifjon Rustamovich

Abstract

 This article examines the implementation and impact of interactive simulators in contemporary educational settings. Through systematic literature review and data collection from multiple educational institutions, we analyze the effectiveness of various simulation technologies across different disciplines. Results indicate that interactive simulators significantly enhance student engagement, knowledge retention, and skills development, particularly in STEM fields, healthcare education, and business training. The findings suggest that strategic integration of simulation technologies with traditional teaching methods creates optimal learning environments, though challenges remain regarding accessibility, faculty training, and technological infrastructure. This research contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting technology-enhanced learning paradigms in modern education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

INTERACTIVE SIMULATORS USED IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS TODAY. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(3), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.55640/

References

Bawa, P., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. (2021). Effectiveness of educational virtual reality-based simulations: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1845-1875.

Bhattacharya, S., & Mukherjee, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality simulation in nursing education: A bibliometric analysis. Nurse Education Today, 92, 104528.

Brown, M., McCormack, M., Reeves, J., Brook, D. C., Grajek, S., Alexander, B., Bali, M., Bulger, S., Dark, S., Engelbert, N., Gannon, K., Gauthier, A., Gibson, D., Gibson, R., Lundin, B., Veletsianos, G., & Weber, N. (2020). 2020 EDUCAUSE Horizon Report Teaching and Learning Edition. EDUCAUSE.

Chang, R., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in digital game-based learning in the mobile era: A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 12(1), 68-90.

Cook, D. A., Hatala, R., Brydges, R., Zendejas, B., Szostek, J. H., Wang, A. T., Erwin, P. J., & Hamstra, S. J. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 306(9), 978-988.

De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308.

Ferrel, M. N., & Ryan, J. J. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus, 12(3), e7492.

Fowler, C. (2015). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412-422.

Graafland, M., Schraagen, J. M., & Schijven, M. P. (2012). Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. British Journal of Surgery, 99(10), 1322-1330.

Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(1), 1-32.

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3-D) immersive virtual worlds in K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 33-55.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.