ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ANATOMY EDUCATION THROUGH MODERN VISUAL TECHNOLOGIES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Anatomy, as one of the fundamental disciplines in medical education, plays a critical role in shaping the foundational knowledge of future healthcare professionals. Traditional methods of teaching anatomy, primarily based on cadaver dissection and textbook illustrations, often face limitations in terms of accessibility, interactivity, and student engagement. In recent years, the integration of modern visual technologies — such as 3D modeling, augmented reality (AR), and virtual reality (VR) — has revolutionized the way anatomical content is delivered and perceived. These innovations offer immersive and dynamic learning experiences, allowing students to explore complex anatomical structures in greater detail and within a clinically relevant context.
This shift aligns with global trends in medical pedagogy that emphasize active learning, digital literacy, and personalized educational approaches. Moreover, visual technologies contribute to better spatial understanding, knowledge retention, and learner satisfaction. Despite their growing popularity, there is a need for more structured implementation and evidence-based evaluation of their impact on educational outcomes. This article explores the potential of modern visual tools in anatomy teaching and discusses strategies for their effective integration into the medical curriculum.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.McNulty M.A., Sonntag B., Sinacore J.M., et al. Association between improved student performance and use of anatomy learning resources in a clinical anatomy course // Anatomical Sciences Education. – 2009. – Vol. 2, No. 5. – P. 218–226.
2.Nicholson D.T., Chalk C., Funnell W.R., Daniel S.J. Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? A randomized controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model // Medical Education. – 2006. – Vol. 40, No. 11. – P. 1081–1087.
3.Yammine K., Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy // Anatomical Sciences Education. – 2015. – Vol. 8, No. 6. – P. 525–538.
4.Azer S.A., Azer S. 3D anatomy models and impact on learning: A review of the quality of the literature // Health Professions Education. – 2016. – Vol. 2, No. 2. – P. 80–98.
5.Estai M., Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review // Annals of Anatomy. – 2016. – Vol. 208. – P. 151–157.
6.Petersson H., Sinkvist D., Wang C., Smedby Ö. Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning // Anatomical Sciences Education. – 2009. – Vol. 2, No. 2. – P. 61–68.
7.Moro C., Štromberga Z., Raikos A., Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy // Anatomical Sciences Education. – 2017. – Vol. 10, No. 6. – P. 549–559.
8.Tam M.D., Hart A.R., Williams S., Heylings D.J. Is learning anatomy facilitated by computer-aided learning? A review of literature // Medical Teacher. – 2009. – Vol. 31, No. 9. – P. e393–e396.