DIFFERENTIAL EDUCATIONAL APPROACHES: METHODS OF WORKING WITH GIFTED STUDENTS IN FINNISH SCHOOLS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores differential educational approaches applied in Finnish schools for working effectively with gifted students. Drawing on Finland’s inclusive and flexible education system, the study investigates how teachers identify, support, and challenge high-ability learners without formal labeling. The article reviews classroom differentiation strategies, project-based learning models, and the integration of socio-emotional support as part of everyday instruction. Through qualitative analysis of policy documents, academic literature, and interviews with Finnish educators, the study highlights how equity-driven practices in Finland allow gifted students to thrive alongside their peers. The findings offer practical insights for adapting differentiated instruction methods in other educational contexts, particularly in countries undergoing curriculum reform.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Radjapova, Z. (2025). METHODOLOGY OF DEVELOPING CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY OF EDUCATORS OF PRE-SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH LANDSCAPE DESIGN. JOURNAL OF PRE-SCHOOL AND SCHOOL EDUCATION, 3(1).
2. Shomurodov, Sh. Sh. (2022). IMPORTANCE AND NECESSITY OF DISTANCE LEARNING IN FORMING INFORMATION COMPETENCE IN FUTURE SPECIALISTS. RESEARCH AND EDUCATION, 161.
3. Shukhratovich, S. S. (2023). TECHNOLOGY OF FORMATION OF INDEPENDENT CREATIVE THINKING COMPETENCE IN STUDENTS IN EDUCATION.European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 3(02), 146-150.
4. Shomurodov, S. (2023). ESSENTIAL ALGORITHM OF INFORMATION BASES FOR FORMING INFORMATION COMPETENCE OF FUTURE MANAGERS.Science and innovation, 2(A6), 5-10.
5. Shukhratovich, S. S. (2023). TECHNOLOGY OF FORMATION OF INDEPENDENT CREATIVE THINKING COMPETENCE IN STUDENTS IN EDUCATION.European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 3(02), 146-150.
6. Sh, S. S. (2024). DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION COMPETENCE OF FUTURE MANAGERS IN DISTANCE EDUCATION.Economics and society, (7 (122)), 283-288.
7. Shomurodov, S. (2025). NAVIGATING THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS: EFFECTIVE METHODS FOR IMPROVING LEARNING OUTCOMES.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 1(2), 1126-1131.
8. Shomurodov, S. (2025). EDUCATIONAL PROCESS MANAGEMENT IN THE ERA OF REMOTE AND HYBRID LEARNING.Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 1(2), 698-704.
9. Shomurodov, S. (2025). THE EVOLUTION OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS: FROM TRADITIONAL CLASSROOMS TO DIGITAL LEARNING.Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 1(2), 710-714.
10. Sh, S. S. (2024). DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION COMPETENCE OF FUTURE MANAGERS IN DISTANCE EDUCATION.Economics and society, (7 (122)), 283-288.
11.Shomurodov, Sh. (2024, July). Managing the educational process in the context of distance learning. In CONFERENCE ON THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCIENCE IN THE MODERN WORLD (Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 35-38).
12.Shomurodov, S. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence and data analysis in managing the educational process in the context of distance and hybrid learning. PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC AND INNOVATIVE RESEARCH, 1(2), 59-63.
13.Shomurodov, Sh. Sh. (2022). TECHNOLOGY FOR FORMING INDEPENDENT CREATIVE THINKING COMPETENCE IN STUDENTS IN DISTANCE LEARNING. EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS ONLINE SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL, 36-41.
14.Rakhimova, D. O., & Shomurodov, S. S. (2021). ON THE CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION AND THE LECTURES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM OF UZBEKISTAN. Global Science and Innovations: Central Asia (see in books), 8(1), 58-62.
15.Khayitovich, A. M. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF RATIONALISM AND IRRATIONALISM. CRITICAL VIEW, ANALYTICAL THOUGHT AND INNOVATIVE IDEAS, 2(1), 247-249.
16.Khayitovich, A. M. (2025). RATIONALISM AND IRRATIONALISM – FEATURES OF ANTIQUE AND MIDDLE AGES. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, EDUCATION AND INNOVATIONS, 1(7), 64-66.
17. Khayitovich, A. M. (2025). RATIONALISM AND IRRATIONALISM IN SUFI TEACHING. JOURNAL OF FOUNDATIONAL SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1(6), 22-25.
18. Khayitovich, A. M. (2025). ANALYSIS OF RATIONALISTIC AND IRRATIONALISTIC VIEWS IN THE MEDIEVAL ISLAMIC EAST. YANGI UZBEKISTAN, JOURNAL OF NEW RESEARCH, 3(1), 253-257.
19. Khayitovich, A. M. (2025, June). TYPES AND FORMS OF THE CONCEPT OF RATIONALITY. In CONFERENCE OF MODERN SCIENCE & PEDAGOGY (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 185-186).
20. Khayitovich, A. M. (2025). ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPTS OF RATIONALISM AND IRRATIONALISM.CRITICAL REVIEW, ANALYTICAL THINKING AND INNOVATIVE IDEAS, 2(1), 247-249.
21. Khayitovich, A. M. (2025). Social-Pedagogical Aspects of Forming Personal Qualities.Spanish Journal of Innovation and Integrity, 39, 161-164.
22. Khaitovich, A. M. (2023). Ontological and Epistemological Views of Tabatabai.Miasto Przyszłości, 36, 77-83.
23. Allanazarov, M. X. (2023). CLASSIFICATION OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND PHILOSOPHICAL HERITAGE OF TABATOBAI. In Creativity and Intellect in Higher Education: International Scientific-Practical Conference (pp. 58-66).
24. Allanazarov, M. K. (2023). ANALYSIS OF DIALECTIC MATERIALISM IN THE NATURAL APPROACH.SCHOLAR, 1(15), 159-165.
25. Allanazarov, M. K., & Mamasaliev, M. M. (2020). ANALYSIS OF COMPREHENSION METHODS IN THE GNOSEOLOGY OF ALLAME TABATABAI. In INNOVATSIONNOE RAZVITIE: POTENTSIAL NAUKI I SOVREMENNOGO OBRAZOVANIya (pp. 106-109).