EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND PEDAGOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT MANAGEMENT BASED ON THE CONCEPTUAL MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
conceptual model, student management, pedagogical monitoring, experimental research, pedagogical effectiveness.Abstract
This scientific article provides an in-depth analysis of the theoretical foundations, practical implementation, and experimental results of a conceptual model aimed at improving the student management process in higher education institutions. The study focuses on determining the pedagogical effectiveness of a management model based on the integration of pedagogical monitoring, developmental assessment, and a competency-based approach. During experimental trials, the model’s impact on students’ academic engagement, learning retention, reflective thinking, and self-management competencies was examined. The results demonstrate that a student management system organized on the basis of the conceptual model contributes to enhancing education quality and ensuring the scientific grounding of management decisions.
Downloads
References
1.Zaripova D. Pedagogik monitoring va ta’lim sifatini boshqarish. – Toshkent: Fan, 2019.
2.Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 1998.
3.OECD. The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. – Paris, 2005.
4.Sadler D.R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 1989.
5.Siemens G., Long P. Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India