ANALYSIS OF PRACTICE OF TEACHING ESP AT VOCATIONAL COLLEGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference), vocational college, authentic materials, communicative competence, English for Specific Purposes, academic lyceum.Abstract
This article explores the current practice of teaching English for Specific Purposes (ESP) at vocational colleges. It emphasizes the use of authentic materials, teacher autonomy, and workplace simulation for effective instruction. The piece highlights challenges such as low student motivation and language proficiency, and stresses the importance of aligning ESP content with industry demands. Overall, the article underscores the need for modernized, purpose-driven ESP teaching in vocational education.
Downloads
References
1.A. Tajieva, N. Babaniyazova (2015) Educational Reforms in the Republic of Uzbekistan in Operation; International Scientific Journal Theoretical & Applied Science 07 (27): 134-137.
2.Kohonen, V. (2009). Autonomy, authenticity and agency in language education: the European language portfolio as a pedagogical resource. In R. Kantelinen & P. Pollari (Eds.) Language education and lifelong learning (pp. 9-44). University of Eastern Finland.
3.M. Hancock and Annie McDonald (2015) Authentic Listening Resource Pack (Bridging the gap to real-world listening) Delta Publishing: Hoe Lane, PeaslakeSurrey GU5 9SW 2015
4.Pinner, R. (2012). Examining Authenticity and Motivation from an International Perspective. The JACET-SIG on ESP Annual Report, 14, 26-3
5.Rankin, P. T. The measurement of the ability to understand spoken language. The English Journal, 1952. 12, 847-848.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India