METHODOLOGY OF TEACHING ENGLISH IN NON-PHILOLOGICAL DISCIPLINES: CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the key challenges faced in teaching English to students in non-philological disciplines and proposes practical, evidence-informed solutions. As English grows in importance across scientific, technical, and professional domains, students in fields like agriculture, engineering, and business must develop communicative competence despite lacking a language-learning background. Using a qualitative approach that incorporates teacher reflections, classroom observations, and learner feedback, this paper identifies major obstacles – such as limited motivation, subject-specific vocabulary, and restricted instructional time – and presents targeted pedagogical strategies to address them. Findings suggest that integrating English for Specific Purposes (ESP), task-based learning, and interdisciplinary collaboration can significantly improve outcomes.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centred Approach. Cambridge University Press.
2.Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Cambridge University Press.
3.TURDALIYEVA, D. (2018). Linguistic opportunity and artistic art. Scientific journal of the Fergana State University, 1(3), 79-83.
4.Turdalieva, D. (2019). Artistic-aesthetic functions of options of folk proverbs. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR), 8(2), 37-42.
5.Inoyatova, Z. (2024). THE MECHANISM OF IMPROVING THE SYSTEM OF METHODOLOGICAL PREPARATION IN TEACHING THE SUBJECT OF UPBRINGING IN FUTURE TEACHERS OF PRIMARY EDUCATION. Science and innovation, 3(B11), 162-165.
6.Jamolova, M. (2022). Characteristics of Mythological Worlds and their Impact on Human Consciousness. Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 7.
7.Dhabliya, D., Ugli, I. S. M., Murali, M. J., Abbas, A. H., & Gulbahor, U. (2023). Computer vision: Advances in image and video analysis. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 399, p. 04045). EDP Sciences.
8.Bisht, Y. S., Alzubaidi, L. H., Gulbakhor, U., Yuvaraj, S., Saravanan, T., Kumar, R. S., & Dari, S. S. (2024). Legal Framework for Energy Transition: Balancing Innovation and Regulation. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 540, p. 13015). EDP Sciences.
9.Olimova, D. Z., & Turaeva, Z. A. (2022). The peculiar complexity of translating uzbek classical poetry into English.
10.Latifovna, I. G. (2025). Engaging minds and bodies: the power of total physical response in language learning. SHOKH LIBRARY.