MASTERING A FOREIGN LANGUAGE AT THE C1 LEVEL: THE ROLE OF METACOGNITIVE APPROACH AND INDIVIDUAL LEARNING STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Metacognition, Individual Learning Strategies, Language Proficiency, C1 Level, Autonomous Learning, Self-regulationAbstract
This paper explores how the metacognitive approach and individualized learning strategies contribute to achieving advanced (C1) proficiency in a foreign language. With growing demand for autonomous learners capable of managing their own progress, this study emphasizes the importance of learners’ ability to monitor and regulate their cognitive processes. The paper synthesizes research findings on metacognitive awareness and examines specific learning strategies proven effective for high-level language acquisition. The implications for language instruction and learner autonomy are also discussed.
Downloads
References
1.Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest.
2.Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
3.Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
4.Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action. Routledge.
5.Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.
6.Wenden, A. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India