THE IMPACT OF ACADEMIC INTEGRITY INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS’ ETHICAL USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ACADEMIC WRITING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20590045Keywords:
academic integrity, artificial intelligence, academic writing, ethical AI use, plagiarism, higher educationAbstract
The rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has created new opportunities and ethical challenges in academic writing. This study investigated the impact of academic integrity instruction on university students’ AI usage behaviors and understanding of ethical AI use in academic writing. A quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design was employed involving undergraduate students who completed questionnaires before and after an instructional intervention focused on academic integrity and responsible AI practices. The findings indicated that academic integrity instruction contributed to reduced plagiarism-related behaviors and more purposeful AI use. Students demonstrated improved understanding of the distinction between AI-assisted and AI-generated writing and reported greater use of AI during appropriate stages of the writing process. The study suggests that academic integrity instruction may play an important role in promoting responsible AI integration and strengthening ethical academic practices in higher education.
Downloads
References
1.Bretag, T. (2016). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLoS Medicine, 13(12), e1002183.
2.Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239.
3.Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., ... & Wright, R. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
4.Eaton, S. E. (2021). Plagiarism in higher education: Tackling tough topics in academic integrity. ABC-CLIO.
5.Fishman, T. (2014). The fundamental values of academic integrity (2nd ed.). International Center for Academic Integrity.
6.Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
7.Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
8.Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100151.
9.Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-pandemic era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(2), 1–12.
10.Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363.
11.Sokoliuk, K., Brika, S., & McLaughlin, P. (2024). Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in higher education: Emerging ethical considerations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 165–181.
12.Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India