POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND CHATGPT PLATFORMS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, education, learning process, academic integrity, digital pedagogyAbstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has significantly transformed modern education systems. Among these technologies, AI-powered platforms such as ChatGPT have gained widespread adoption by students for learning support, information retrieval, writing assistance, and problem-solving. While these tools offer substantial pedagogical benefits, they also raise serious academic, ethical, and cognitive concerns. This article examines the positive and negative consequences of using AI and ChatGPT in the educational process. Based on an analysis of international empirical studies, policy reports, and academic literature, the study evaluates the impact of AI tools on learning effectiveness, critical thinking, academic integrity, and student autonomy. The findings indicate that although AI enhances accessibility, personalization, and learning efficiency, excessive or unregulated use may negatively affect independent thinking, motivation, and assessment validity. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for balanced, pedagogically guided integration of AI technologies in education.
Downloads
References
1.Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston: Center for Curriculum Redesign, pp. 23–30.
2.UNESCO. (2021). AI and Education: Guidance for Policy-makers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, pp. 12–18.
3.OECD. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Society. Paris: OECD Publishing, pp. 55–61.
4.World Bank. (2020). Reimagining Human Connections: Technology and Innovation in Education. Washington, DC, pp. 44–50.
5.Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. (2023). ChatGPT: Implications for academic integrity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(6), pp. 1–12.
6.Kasneci, E. et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, pp. 101–109.
7.Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic review of AI applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), pp. 7–15.
8.Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2022). Writing next: AI-supported academic writing. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), pp. 210–218.
9.European University Association. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Tools and Academic Integrity. Brussels, pp. 9–14.
10.Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), pp. 261–276.
11.Bender, E. et al. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 610–623.
12.Selwyn, N. (2022). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 88–95.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
