PRAGMALINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL CONGRATULATORY SPEECHES IN THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA: A CASE STUDY OF TEACHERS’ DAY DISCOURSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
pragmalinguistics, Korean discourse, Teachers’ Day, political speech, honorific language, ideologyAbstract
This study investigates the pragmalinguistic features of presidential congratulatory speeches in the Republic of Korea, focusing on Teachers’ Day discourse. The research analyzes how linguistic means are used to express gratitude, construct ideological meaning, and reinforce social relations.
The study integrates lexical-semantic, stylistic, and pragmatic analysis. Findings show that Korean presidential speeches are characterized by high formality, emotional expressiveness, honorific usage, and ideological framing. These speeches function not only as ceremonial texts but also as instruments of political communication and national value construction.
Downloads
References
1.Aminov M., Madvaliev A., Mahkamov N., Mahmudov N. Office Work (Business Documentation). – Tashkent: National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan, 2015. – 327 P.
2.Parshina, Olga Nikolaevna. Strategies and Tactics of Speech Behavior of the Modern Political Elite of Russia: Monograph / O. N. Parshina; ed. O. B. Sirotinina. – Astrakhan: ASTU Publishing House, 2004. – 461 P.
3.https://www.sedaily.com/NewsView/29PL7FBRGU#cb
4.https://news.kbs.co.kr/news/pc/view/view.do?ncd=5462101
https://korean.dict.naver.com/korudict/#/entry/koru/f55a88e4b9ad4793bcdb51347cf208d2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India