A FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO FOOTBALL COMMENTARY TRANSLATION: LINGUISTIC AND PRAGMATIC DIMENSIONS

Authors

  • D.D. Mamanazarova Teacher, Uzbekistan State World Languages University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

football commentary, translation, linguopragmatics, functional approach, evaluative language, pragmatic equivalence.

Abstract

This study explores the translation of football commentary from a functional perspective, focusing on its linguistic and pragmatic dimensions. Football commentary represents a highly dynamic and spontaneous form of discourse characterized by evaluative language, emotional intensity, and real-time constraints. The research aims to identify the key linguistic features of football commentary and examine how these features are transferred across languages while maintaining pragmatic equivalence. Using a comparative discourse-analytical method, the study analyzes English and Uzbek football commentaries to determine translation strategies such as modulation, adaptation, and equivalence. The findings reveal that functional adequacy often outweighs formal equivalence, and pragmatic factors such as audience expectations and cultural context play a crucial role in translation.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Martin J. R., White P. R. R. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. – London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. – 278 p.

2.Nida E. A. Toward a Science of Translating. – Leiden: Brill, 1964. – 331 p.

3.Nord C. Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. – Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing, 1997. – 154 p.

4.Vermeer H. J. Skopos and Commission in Translational Action // The Translation Studies Reader / ed. by L. Venuti. – London: Routledge, 2000. – P. 221–232.

5.Munday J. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. – 4th ed. – London: Routledge, 2016. – 376 p.

6.Baker M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. – 3rd ed. – London: Routledge, 2018. – 360 p.

7.Newmark P. A Textbook of Translation. – London: Prentice Hall, 1988. – 292 p.

8.Hatim B., Mason I. Discourse and the Translator. – London: Longman, 1990. – 258 p.

9.House J. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. – Tübingen: Narr, 2015. – 208 p.

10.Tajvidi G. R., Arjani S. H. Appraisal theory in translation studies: An introduction and review // Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics. – 2017. – Vol. 8, No. 1. – P. 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

A FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO FOOTBALL COMMENTARY TRANSLATION: LINGUISTIC AND PRAGMATIC DIMENSIONS. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(4), 772-776. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2276

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.