DIFFERENCES OF ADVERBS IN THE RUSSIAN AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Indo-European family, Turkic family, characteristic of action, qualitative adverbs, manner of action.Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of adverbs as a grammatical category in the Russian and Uzbek languages. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to identify typological similarities and differences between languages belonging to different language families (Indo-European and Turkic). The author examines the morphological structure of adverbs, their semantic classification, and the specific features of their functioning in syntactic constructions. Particular attention is paid to word-formation methods and degrees of comparison, which makes it possible to gain a deeper understanding of the mechanisms used to express the characteristics of an action in both languages.
Downloads
References
1.Pavel A. Lekant. Modern Russian Language. — Moscow, 2004. — p. 292.
2.Viktor V. Kolesov. History of the Russian Language. — Moscow, 2005. — p. 603.
3.L. I. Shapovalova, E. A. Sviridenko. Russian Language: Morphology. — Mogilev: Mogilev State University named after A. A. Kuleshov, 2016. — 136 p.
4.A. Hojiev. Verb (Fe’l). — Tashkent: Fan Publishing House, 1973.
5.G. A. Abdurahmonov. Uzbek Language Grammar. — Tashkent: Fan Publishing House, 1996.
6.M. K. Ruziev. The Importance of Clubs in Teaching the Russian Language to Preschool Education Students. // Economy and Society. – 2024. – No. 2–2 (117). – pp. 614–617.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India