TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL AGE: DIGITAL COMPETENCE, PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATION, AND INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Teacher Professional Development, Digital Competence, Pedagogical Innovation, Institutional Support, Educational Technology Integration, Digital Transformation in Education, Professional LearningAbstract
This study examines teacher professional development (TPD) in the digital age by analyzing the interrelationship between digital competence, pedagogical innovation, and institutional support. As educational systems increasingly integrate digital technologies, teachers are expected to adapt their instructional practices and continuously update their professional skills. However, disparities in digital readiness and organizational support often limit effective technology integration.
Downloads
References
1.Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
2.European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan 2021–2027. Brussels, Belgium: European Union.
3.Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
4.Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Springer.
5.OECD. (2019). Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
6.Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. (2010). Examining technology-enhanced teacher professional development through a TPACK lens. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.2.b
7.Scherer, R., & Teo, T. (2019). Integrating technology into teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 142, 103648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103648
8.Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
9.Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040004807
10.Atanazarova, S. B. (2026). Expression of perlocution and illocution in advertising texts on the topic of education in the Uzbek language. Komparativistika (Comparative Studies), 1(9), 232–242.
11.Atanazarova, Sh. B. (2026, February 2). Oʻzbek tilida maishiy mavzudagi reklama matnida illokutsiya va perlokutsiyani ifodalovchi vositalar [Means of expressing illocution and perlocution in advertising texts on everyday topics in the Uzbek language]. Global Conference on Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, Online conference hosted from Berlin, Germany. https://econferencia.com
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
