COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS AT A2 AND B1 LEVELS OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOLS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the comparative analysis of English language teaching methods used at the A2 and B1 levels in secondary schools of Uzbekistan. The study investigates the effectiveness of the grammar-translation method, communicative language teaching (CLT), and task-based learning (TBL) in developing students’ speaking, listening, reading, and writing skills. data were collected through classroom observations, teacher interviews, and learner questionnaires from three selected schools in tashkent region.the research aligns with the goals of the “Uzbekistan – 2030” development strategy, which emphasizes modernizing the education system, improving the quality of english language instruction, and developing globally competitive youth. In particular, it supports the national task of ensuring that every graduate achieves at least a B1 proficiency level in a foreign language by the end of secondary education. The paper concludes with recommendations for implementing blended, student-centered teaching strategies integrating technology, project-based tasks, and real-life communication. These practices are consistent with uzbekistan’s strategic goal of creating an innovative, knowledge-based society and ensuring quality foreign language education as a foundation for sustainable national development.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
2.Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
3.Littlewood, W. (2011). Communicative language teaching: An expanding concept for a changing world. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 541-557). Routledge.
4.Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
5.Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
6.Impact of Technology ON Education
7.articlehttps://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impacts-technology-education itek-group
8.G. Mahkamova, Z. Gulyamova, D. Subanova. Methodology
9.of teaching English to young learners. T. 2023
10.Mirziyoyev, Shavkat M 54 Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi. To'ldirilgan ikkinchi nashri. - Toshkent: "O'zbekiston" nashriyoti, 2022. - 416 bet. ISBN 978-9943-7951-7-4