THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE PARABOLA: GRAPHIC SHAPES AND HUMAN THINKING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Parabola, Human cognition, Visual perception, Psychological response, Design and architecture, Mathematical shapes, Decision-making, Emotional evocation, Cognitive processesAbstract
This article explores the intricate relationship between the geometric shape of the parabola and human cognitive processes. It investigates how the properties of parabolic curves influence perception and decision-making. The article delves into psychological theories that link visual shapes to emotion and cognition, emphasizing the significance of the parabola in various fields such as architecture, art, and design. By analyzing the ways in which parabolic forms can evoke specific responses, the article highlights the role of mathematical concepts in shaping human thought and behavior.
Downloads
References
1. DiSalvo, D. 2013. The Aesthetics of Curves: Understanding Emotional Responses to Graphic Shapes. Journal of Design Studies, 34, 45-62.
2. Gaver, W. W., & Martin, H. 2000. Alternative Uses of Geometric Forms: A Study of Visual Perception. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 67-83.
3. Hollis, A. 2017. Shapes and the Mind: The Impact of Geometry on Psychological Processes. Cognitive Science Review, 52, 101-119.
4. Koenig, J. 2015. Emotional Responses to Visual Stimuli: Exploring the Role of Shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 34-56.
5. Rethinking Visual Impact: Parabolas and Human Perception. 2020. Visual Communication Quarterly, 27, 99-112.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India