THE INTERPRETATION OF THE CONCEPT “APPEARANCE” IN WORLD LINGUISTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Abstract
In world linguistics, the study of conceptual structures has become one of the central areas of cognitive and cultural research. Among the numerous conceptual domains that shape human cognition, the concept of “appearance” occupies a unique position, as it reflects the perception of the human body, social evaluation, metaphorical thinking, cultural symbolism, and identity construction. The interpretation of the “appearance” concept goes far beyond its physical description; it includes cognitive, psychological, cultural, ethical, and communicative layers. Consequently, its study helps linguists understand how different cultures conceptualize the human image and how these conceptualizations are manifested in language.This article provides a theoretical overview of how the concept “appearance” is interpreted in world linguistics. It analyzes the evolution of approaches to conceptual research, the structure of the “appearance” concept, its cognitive complexity, its representation in semantic space, and the cultural values encoded within it.
Downloads
References
1.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
2.Kövecses, Z. Metaphor in Culture. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
3.Wierzbicka, A. Semantics, Culture and Cognition. Oxford University Press, 1992.
4.Evans, V., & Green, M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press, 2006
5.Fillmore, C. J. Frame Semantics. Michigan Press, 1985.
6.Bartmiński, J. The Cognitive Definition. Lublin: UMCS Press, 2009.
7.Talmy, L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. MIT Press, 2000.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India