THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC THEORIES IN LINGUISTICS EDUCATION: A MODERN PERSPECTIVE

Main Article Content

Davlatova Muhayyo Hasanovna

Abstract

This article explores the fundamental cognitive-semantic theories in linguistics, including the works of Lancaster, Lakoff, Fillmore, and Croft. It discusses the foundations of cognitive semantics in the context of educational policy changes necessary for enhancing linguistic disciplines amid transformations in higher education. The focus is on improving the qualifications and development of the industry, especially regarding the effective training of specialists in linguistics and the creation of efficient language teaching methods. The relevance of these theories is underscored by the need for high-quality training for students in linguistic fields and the development of their knowledge and skills. The aim of this study is to establish key theoretical positions and directions within cognitive-semantic theory in linguistics, assess the benefits of teaching the fundamentals of cognitive linguistics, and evaluate the appropriateness of employing cognitive-semantic methods in educational practices. Various research methods were utilized, including linguistic description, observation, analysis, and synthesis. The findings highlight the necessity of studying foundational linguistic theories and general theoretical principles of cognitive linguistics, which remains a vital approach within the postmodern academic landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE-SEMANTIC THEORIES IN LINGUISTICS EDUCATION: A MODERN PERSPECTIVE. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(4), 1157-1162. https://doi.org/10.55640/

References

1. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1 & 2). Cambridge University Press.

2. Saeed, J. I. (2016). Semantics (4th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

3. Cruse, D. A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press.

4. Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

5. Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm (pp. 111–137). Hanshin Publishing Company.

6. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. University of Chicago Press.

7. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.

8. Yule, G. (2016). The Study of Language (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

9. Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

10. Jackendoff, R. (1990). Semantic Structures. MIT Press.

11. Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford University Press.

12. Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

13. Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge University Press.

14. Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

15. Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford University Press.

16. Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. S. (1992). Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, Fields, and Contrasts (pp. 75–102). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford University Press.

18. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

19. Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic Categorization. Oxford University Press.

20. Nunberg, G., Sag, I. A., & Wasow, T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491–538.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.