TRADITIONAL VS. INNOVATIVE TEACHING APPROACHES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

  • Yuldoshev Khaydarbek EFL teacher at Mamun university Khorezm region, Khiva

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

traditional teaching, innovative pedagogy, higher education, teaching effectiveness, blended learning

Abstract

The effectiveness of teaching approaches has become a central concern in higher education due to rapid technological advancement and changing learner expectations. Traditional teaching approaches, characterized by teacher-centered instruction and content transmission, continue to dominate many educational contexts. At the same time, innovative approaches emphasizing learner-centered, technology-enhanced, and active learning strategies are increasingly promoted. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of traditional and innovative teaching approaches in higher education by examining their impact on student engagement, learning outcomes, and skill development. Using a mixed-methods research design, data were collected from undergraduate students and university instructors through questionnaires, classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews. The findings reveal that while traditional approaches remain effective for knowledge delivery and academic structure, innovative approaches significantly enhance learner engagement, motivation, and higher-order thinking skills. The study concludes that a blended pedagogical model combining traditional and innovative elements is the most effective strategy for higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC.

2.Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings.

3.Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.

4.Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

5.UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

TRADITIONAL VS. INNOVATIVE TEACHING APPROACHES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 265-268. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 2948

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.