THE PPP VS. TBLT: OVERCOMING TRADITIONAL TEACHING HABITS IN UZBEK SECONDARY SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19781507Keywords:
PPP model; Task-Based Language Teaching; Uzbek secondary schools; teaching habits; communicative competenceAbstract
This article examines the pedagogical contrast between the Presentation-Practice-Production (PPP) model and Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in the context of Uzbek secondary schools. Despite ongoing educational reforms that emphasize communicative competence, classroom instruction continues to rely heavily on traditional, teacher-centered approaches. Using a qualitative analytical framework, the study explores how entrenched teaching habits, cultural expectations, and institutional constraints shape methodological choices in foreign language education. The findings suggest that while TBLT offers significant advantages for communicative development, its implementation in Uzbek secondary schools is limited by exam-oriented assessment systems and established instructional norms. The article argues that overcoming traditional teaching habits requires a gradual, context-sensitive integration of task-based principles rather than the complete replacement of the PPP model.
Downloads
References
1.Carless, D. (2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus PPP debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 49–66.
2.Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
3.Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Longman.
4.Littlewood, W. (2007). Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Language Teaching, 40(3), 243–249.
5.Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
6.Willis, J., & Willis, D. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India