HOW TO OVERCOME COMMON CHALLENGES IN ONLINE ENGLISH TEACHING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
online English teaching, learner engagement, digital divide, teacher competence, online assessment, virtual learning, communication barriers, digital literacy, intercultural competence, online education.Abstract
Online English teaching has become an essential component of modern education, offering flexibility, accessibility, and opportunities for global learning. However, it also presents several challenges that can affect the effectiveness of instruction and learner outcomes. This paper investigates common challenges in online English teaching, including learner engagement, digital divide issues, teacher competence, assessment limitations, communication barriers, and cultural diversity. Through a review of recent scholarly literature, the study identifies key factors that influence the success of online English instruction and examines practical strategies to overcome these challenges. The findings suggest that interactive teaching methods, effective use of digital tools, continuous teacher professional development, and inclusive instructional practices play a crucial role in improving the quality of online education. Additionally, the integration of formative assessment techniques and the promotion of social presence contribute to enhanced student participation and motivation. The study concludes that a holistic and adaptive approach is necessary to address the complexities of online English teaching and to ensure equitable and effective learning experiences in digital environments.
Downloads
References
1.Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00234-4
2.Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S. R., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Jr., & others. (2022). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 1–126.
3.Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2023). Group dynamics in the language classroom (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
4.Ersin, P., Atay, D., & Mede, E. (2020). Boosting preservice teachers’ competence and online teaching readiness through e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09951-8
5.Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004
6.Guillén, F. D., Doménech-Betoret, F., & Gómez-Artiga, A. (2022). The role of cultural diversity in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 176, 104356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104356
7.Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of engagement in online learning environments: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10087-5
8.Helm, F. (2020). Internationalization in higher education and digital learning: The role of intercultural competence. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 1–10.
9.Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review.
10.Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12505
11.Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63, 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
12.Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
