THE LINGUISTIC EXPRESSION OF LAUGHTER AND CRYING: A CROSS-CULTURAL ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
emotional vocalizations, phonosemantics, English linguistics, Uzbek linguistics, laughter expressions, crying expressions, cross-cultural communicationAbstract
This article examines the linguistic representation of laughter and crying in English and Uzbek languages, exploring their origins, phonetic characteristics, and cultural manifestations. Drawing on recent research in phonosemantics, evolutionary linguistics, and cross-cultural communication studies, the paper analyzes how these universal human emotions are encoded differently across linguistic boundaries. The study reveals both universal patterns rooted in biological vocalization and language-specific conventions shaped by cultural and phonological systems. Recent neurolinguistic findings demonstrate that emotional vocalizations activate similar brain regions across languages, while their written representations reflect distinct orthographic traditions. The article contributes to understanding the relationship between natural emotional expression and linguistic conventionalization.
Downloads
References
1.Alimova, N. (2020). Code-switching and emotional expression in Uzbek social media discourse. Central Asian Journal of Linguistics, 15(2), 45-67.
2.Anikin, A., & Johansson, N. (2019). Implicit associations between individual properties of color and sound. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81(3), 764-777.
3.Bryant, G. A., Fessler, D. M., Fusaroli, R., Clint, E., Aarøe, L., Apicella, C. L., ... & Žeželj, I. (2018). The perception of spontaneous and volitional laughter across 21 societies. Psychological Science, 29(9), 1515-1525.
4.Chen, Y., Yuan, J., You, Q., & Luo, J. (2018). Twitter sentiment analysis via bi-sense emoji embedding and attention-based LSTM. Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 117-125.
5.Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
6.Doerfer, G. (1963-1975). Türkische und mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen (4 vols.). Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.
7.Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. J. (Eds.). (1994). Sound symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.Ismatullayeva, S. (2018). Emotional expression in modern Uzbek: A corpus-based analysis. Uzbek Linguistics Review, 12(3), 78-95.
9.Lavan, N., Scott, S. K., & McGettigan, C. (2016). Laugh like you mean it: Authenticity modulates acoustic, physiological and perceptual properties of laughter. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40(2), 133-149.
10.Levin, T. (1996). The hundred thousand fools of God: Musical travels in Central Asia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
11.Nesi, H. (2012). Laughter in university lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 79-89.
12.Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F₀ of voice. Phonetica, 41(1), 1-16.
13.Pell, M. D., Monetta, L., Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Recognizing emotions in a foreign language. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33(2), 107-120.
14.Provine, R. R. (2000). Laughter: A scientific investigation. New York: Viking Penguin.
15.Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(2), 2408-2412.
16.Zeifman, D. M. (2001). An ethological analysis of human infant crying: Answering Tinbergen's four questions. Developmental Psychobiology, 39(4), 265-285.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India