POST-ACTIVATION POTENTIATION (PAP) IN SPORTS PERFORMANCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of this study is to compile and examine the existing knowledge on Post-Activation Potentiation (PAP). By analyzing the mechanisms of PAP, its effects on performance, and its role in sports applications in detail, the study seeks to contribute to the sports science literature. The relationship of PAP with fatigue, its integration into training protocols, and its impact on individual differences will also be addressed. The study aims to provide a basis for developing strategies to enhance athletic performance.
Research indicates that PAP has effects on performance parameters such as jumping, sprinting, strength, and endurance. The literature suggests that many of these effects vary depending on time. Studies show that the PAP effect is more pronounced in stronger individuals. In particular, plyometric exercises and less deep squat movements have been observed to enhance the PAP effect. This situation provides the necessary conditions for muscle fibers to generate potential more effectively. However, the functional importance and long-term effects of PAP are still not fully understood, and further research is needed in this field.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Abbate, F., Sargeant, A. J., Verdijk, P. W., & De Haan, A. (2000). Effects of high-frequency initial stimulation on skeletal muscle contractile properties. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 82(3), 188–196.
2.Bevan, H. R., Owen, N. J., Cunningham, D. J., Kingsley, M. I., Kilduff, L. P. (2010). Complex training in professional rugby players: Influence of recovery time on upper-body power output. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(2), 343–350.
3.Chiu, L. Z. F., Fry, A. C., Weiss, L. W., Schilling, B. K., Brown, L. E., & Smith, S. L. (2003). Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 17(4), 671–677.
4.Crum, A. J., Kawachi, I., & Achor, S. (2012). Positive psychological science: Effects on neural and muscular responses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 655–688.
5.Docherty, D., & Hodgson, M. (2007). The application of postactivation potentiation to elite sport. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2(4), 439–444.
6.Ebben, W. P. (2006). Complex training: A brief review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 5(3), 446–454.
7.French, D. N., Kraemer, W. J., & Cooke, C. B. (2003). Changes in dynamic exercise performance following a sequence of preconditioning isometric muscle actions. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 17(4), 678–685.
8.Grange, R. W., Vandenboom, R., & Houston, M. E. (1993). Physiological significance of postactivation potentiation in skeletal muscle. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 18(1), 91–103.