LOANWORDS AND THEIR ADAPTATION IN RUSSIAN, UZBEK, ENGLISH, AND TURKISH

Authors

  • Ravshanova Adiba Muhammad kizi Samarkand region Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages 2nd year student of the Faculty of English Philology and Translation Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

Loanwords, Lexical Borrowing, Language Contact, Russian Language, Uzbek Language, English Language, Turkish Language, Phonological Adaptation, Morphological Adaptation, Semantic Adaptation, Assimilation (Linguistics)

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of lexical borrowing and its subsequent adaptation in four typologically diverse languages: Russian (Slavic, fusional), Uzbek (Turkic, agglutinative), English (Germanic, analytic), and Turkish (Turkic, agglutinative). The research investigates the factors influencing the borrowing process, including historical contact, cultural exchange, political dominance, and technological advancements. It analyzes the phonological, morphological, and semantic changes that loanwords undergo as they are integrated into each language's system. The study contrasts the strategies employed by each language to adapt foreign vocabulary, considering the role of sound substitutions, vowel harmony (in Uzbek and Turkish), morphological adjustments, and semantic shifts. It also explores the social and cultural attitudes towards loanwords in each language community, examining the impact of language purism and standardization efforts. Data is gathered from dictionaries, corpora, and linguistic analyses. The findings shed light on the dynamic interplay between language contact, linguistic adaptation, and sociocultural factors, providing a comparative perspective on the evolution of vocabulary in these four languages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Auchlin, A., & Hurni, B. (2007). Loanwords. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier, & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik: An international handbook of the science of language and society (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 2246-2257). De Gruyter.

2. Haugen, E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 26(2), 210-231.

3. Myers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes. Oxford University Press.

4. Thomason, S. G. (2001). Language contact: An introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

5. Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Linguistic Circle of New York.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-28

How to Cite

LOANWORDS AND THEIR ADAPTATION IN RUSSIAN, UZBEK, ENGLISH, AND TURKISH. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(7), 516-518. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1711

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.