The Paradox of CSR: Exploring the Boomerang Effect of Firms’ Investments During Product Recalls

Authors

  • Chun Zhu Wang Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing, China

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Boomerang Effect, Product Recalls

Abstract

This study, The Paradox of CSR: Exploring the Boomerang Effect of Firms' Investments During Product Recalls, investigates the unintended consequences of corporate social responsibility (CSR) investments in the context of product recalls. While CSR initiatives are typically seen as a means to build trust and reputation, this research uncovers how excessive or poorly timed CSR investments can backfire during crisis situations such as product recalls. By examining case studies of major firms that experienced product recalls, the study explores the mechanisms behind the "boomerang effect," where increased CSR efforts, instead of improving the firm’s image, may exacerbate consumer skepticism, fuel negative perceptions, and undermine brand equity. The research highlights the role of timing, transparency, and consumer perception in shaping the outcomes of CSR investments during crises. It concludes with recommendations for firms to adopt a more balanced and context-sensitive approach to CSR, ensuring that these investments align with crisis management strategies and consumer expectations. The findings suggest that while CSR can be a powerful tool for companies in crisis, it must be carefully calibrated to avoid amplifying the negative effects of product recalls.

References

Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2007). Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 299-326.

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.

Creyer, E. H., & Ross, W. T. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432.

De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Taking responsibility for corporate social responsibility: The role of leaders in creating, implementing, sustaining, or avoiding socially responsible firm behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(2), 235-248.

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224-241.

Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., & Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 457-469.

Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3-19.

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225-243.

Smith, N. C., & Palazzo, G. (2012). Institutional legitimacy, "greenwashing," and the adoption of sustainable development practices: Implications for organizational behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 327-347.

Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189-204.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-19

How to Cite

The Paradox of CSR: Exploring the Boomerang Effect of Firms’ Investments During Product Recalls. (2023). International Journal of Political Sciences and Economics, 2(3), 4-6. https://ijmri.de/index.php/ijpse/article/view/45

Similar Articles

1-10 of 124

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.