WAYS OF VERBALIZING CHARACTERS' EMOTIONAL STATES IN RUSSIAN CLASSICAL PROSE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
artistic anthropology, verbalization of emotions, psychologism, Russian classical prose, idiolect, representation of feelings, lexical semantics, character’s inner world.Abstract
The article explores artistic anthropology in nineteenth-century Russian classical literature through the prism of the ways characters' emotional states are verbalized. The author analyzes the lexico-semantic, syntactic, and metaphorical means used by writers to recreate the inner world of a human being, including psychological nuances, hidden affects, and emotional crises. The focus centers on the techniques of psychological analysis developed in the prose of I. S. Turgenev, L. N. Tolstoy, and F. M. Dostoevsky. As a result of the study, the key types of emotion nomination and description are identified, reflecting the shift in literary paradigms and the deepening of realistic psychologism.
Downloads
References
1.Bakhtin, M. M. (1972). Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura.
2.Chernets, L. V. (2004). Character. In Introduction to Literary Studies. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 223–236.
3.Esin, A. B. (1988). Psychologism of Russian Classical Literature. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
4.Ginzburg, L. Ya. (1977). On Psychological Prose. Leningrad: Khudozhestvennaya Literatura.
5.Iezuitov, A. N. (1970). The Problem of Psychologism in Aesthetics and Literature. In Problems of Psychologism in Soviet Literature. Leningrad: Nauka, 39–55.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India