THE ROLE OF CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) IN TERTIARY EDUCATION: STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION AND PEDAGOGICAL EFFICACY

Authors

  • Mirzaeva Mukhabbat Zhalolovna Associate Professor of the Department of Languages, Tashkent State Agrarian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20397815

Keywords:

CLIL, Tertiary Education, Bilingualism, Pedagogy, EMI, Scaffolding, Cognitive Load, Higher Education, Language Policy, Multilingualism, Curricular Integration, Professional Development, Academic Literacy, Intercultural Competence, Second Language Acquisition.

Abstract

Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has emerged as a transformative pedagogical framework in tertiary education, bridging the gap between academic subject matter and foreign language proficiency. This article examines the dual-focused approach of CLIL, where English (or another L2) serves as the medium of instruction for non-linguistic subjects. Drawing on quantitative data and qualitative analysis, the study explores how CLIL enhances cognitive flexibility, intercultural competence, and employability among university students. The research identifies critical success factors, including lecturer training, scaffolding strategies, and curriculum design. Despite challenges such as increased cognitive load and the need for systemic institutional support, the findings suggest that CLIL significantly outperforms traditional EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction) models in holistic student development. This paper provides a comprehensive roadmap for higher education institutions to integrate CLIL effectively, ensuring academic rigor is maintained alongside linguistic progression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Marsh, D. (2002). Content and Language Integrated Learning: The European Dimension. University of Jyväskylä.

2.Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.

3.Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182-204.

4.Lasagabaster, D. (2008). Foreign Language Competence in CLIL Courses. Open Applied Linguistics Journal.

5.Coyle, D. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda. International Journal of Bilingual Education.

6.Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. Laredo Publishing Co.

7.Meyer, O. (2010). Towards Fully-Integrated CLIL: Designing for Deep Learning. International CLIL Research Journal.

8.Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.

9.Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The Effects of CLIL on L2 Acquisition of Content. Applied Linguistics, 31(3).

10.Gajo, L. (2007). Linguistic Knowledge and Subject Knowledge: How Does Bilingualism Contribute to Subject Development? International Journal of Bilingual Education.

11.Smit, U. (2010). English as a Lingua Franca in Tertiary Education. De Gruyter Mouton.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

THE ROLE OF CLIL (CONTENT AND LANGUAGE INTEGRATED LEARNING) IN TERTIARY EDUCATION: STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION AND PEDAGOGICAL EFFICACY. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 1845-1847. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20397815

Similar Articles

1-10 of 4192

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.