EXPERIENCE IN ORGANIZING MENTORSHIP AND THE “MASTER-APPRENTICE” SYSTEM IN FOREIGN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20229808Keywords:
mentoring, teacher-student, axiological approach, higher education, pedagogical cooperation, foreign experience, values, academic mentorship.Abstract
This article analyzes the pedagogical experience of organizing mentorship and the “mentor-apprentice” system in foreign higher education institutions. The content, forms, and educational significance of mentoring mechanisms used in universities in the USA, Great Britain, Japan, and South Korea are highlighted. It also reveals the specific aspects of developing cooperation between students and educators based on values.
During the study, the positive impact of the mentorship system on students' professional competence, spiritual and moral development, and social adaptation was analyzed based on scientific sources.
Downloads
References
1. Comparative pedagogy. Study guide. A.A. Ikramov, G.N. Davronova, A.A. Ikramova. 2023
2. Comparative pedagogy. Educational and methodological complex. R. Tukhtasheva. Samarkand 2021.
3. Comparavite Adult Education and learning Authors and Texts edited by Maria Slowey. firenze university press 2016
https://books.fupress.com/catalogue/comparative-adult-education-and-learning/3363
https://hollis.harvard.edu/primo-explore/search?vid=HVD2&sortby=rank&lang=eng_US
4.Pedagogy of Freedom — New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
5.The Essential Guide to Mentoring — London, 2004.
6. Materials from Harvard University's official mentoring programs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India