THE DIFFERENCES IN TERMS RELATED TO GASTRONOMY IN UZBEK AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Bayniyazova Hurliman Atabay kizi Teacher at Uzbekistan State World Languages University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20215067

Keywords:

Gastronomic Terminology, Uzbek Language, Karakalpak Language, Comparative Linguistics, Ethnosemantics, Turkic Dialectology, Culinary Culture.

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive comparative linguistic and ethnosemantic analysis of gastronomic terms within the Uzbek and Karakalpak languages. Belonging to separate branches of the Turkic language family—Uzbek to the Karluk (Southeastern) branch and Karakalpak to the Kipchak (Northwestern) branch—these two languages exhibit a profound genetic unity alongside sharp, historically conditioned lexical variations in their culinary vocabularies. This study investigates the complex ways in which historical trajectories, geopolitical shifts, ecological environments, and primary socio-economic lifestyles (sedentary oasis agriculture versus nomadic and semi-nomadic pastoralism) have structured their respective food-related vocabularies. By classifying the gastronomic lexicon into distinct semantic fields—including traditional staple dishes, dairy and livestock derivatives, processing technologies, thermal cooking methods, and material kitchen culture—this paper maps specific phonetic, morphological, and semantic divergences. The findings indicate that while core Common Turkic roots remain resilient across both systems, Karakalpak preserves archaic Kipchak features, intense Kazakh-Nogai lexical affinities, and a unique deltaic fishing substrate. Conversely, the Uzbek gastronomic lexicon reflects widespread historical convergence with Persian (Tajik) and Arabic linguistic strata, embodying a classic urbanized Central Asian culinary tradition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Baskakov, N. A. (1958). Karakalpakskiy yazyk: Fonetika i morfologiya [The Karakalpak Language: Phonetics and Morphology]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR.

2. Begmatov, E. (2007). Oʻzbek tilining izohli lugʻati [Annotated Dictionary of the Uzbek Language]. Tashkent: Oʻzbekiston milliy ensiklopediyasi.

3. Borovkov, A. K. (1959). Leksika Sredneaziatskogo tefshira XII-XIII vv. [The Lexicon of the Central Asian Tafsir of the 12th-13th Centuries]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Vostochnoy Literatury.

4. Clauson, G. (1972). An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

5. Esbergenov, H. (1993). Etnografiya karakalpakov: Materialnaya kultura va pisha [Ethnography of the Karakalpaks: Material Culture and Food]. Nukus: Bilim.

6. Mengliev, B. (2020). Oʻzbek tili strukturaviy lingvistikasi [Structural Linguistics of the Uzbek Language]. Tashkent: Fan va Texnologiyalar.

7. Radloff, W. (1893). Versuch eines Wörterbuches der Türk-Dialecte [Attempt at a Dictionary of the Turkic Dialects]. Saint Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences.

8. Sevortyan, E. V. (1974–2003). Etimologicheskiy slovar tyurkskikh yazykov [Etymological Dictionary of the Turkic Languages]. Moscow: Nauka.

9. Seytov, J. (2015). Qaraqalpaq tiliniñ túsindirme sózligi [Explanatory Dictionary of the Karakalpak Language]. Nukus: Bilim.

10. Shoniyozov, K. (2001). Oʻzbek xalqining etnogenezi jarayoni [The Process of Ethnogenesis of the Uzbek People]. Tashkent: Sharq.

11. Tojiev, M. (2018). Turkiy tillarning qiyosiy-tarixiy grammatikasi [Comparative-Historical Grammar of Turkic Languages]. Tashkent: Mumtoz Soʻz.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-15

How to Cite

THE DIFFERENCES IN TERMS RELATED TO GASTRONOMY IN UZBEK AND KARAKALPAK LANGUAGES. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 1041-1045. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20215067

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2249

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.