LACUNAE AND INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE: PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS, COMPENSATION STRATEGIES, AND THE LINGUACULTURAL WORLDVIEW

Authors

  • Abdalimov Suhrob Islom ugli Independent Researcher, Department of English Functional Lexicon Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20008172

Keywords:

lacunae, intercultural competence, language pedagogy, compensation strategies, linguacultural worldview, foreign language acquisition, translation training

Abstract

 This article investigates lacunae — lexical, semantic, and cultural gaps between languages — from the perspectives of language pedagogy, intercultural communication, and the linguacultural worldview. Building on theoretical foundations established in lacunology, it examines how lacunae function as sites of intercultural friction and learning, how language educators can incorporate lacuna awareness into communicative competence curricula, and what compensation strategies are available when speakers or translators encounter lacunar phenomena. The article draws on research in applied linguistics, foreign language acquisition, and intercultural communication theory to argue that lacunae are not obstacles to be minimized but resources to be leveraged for developing deeper cross-cultural understanding. Special attention is given to the role of lacunae in shaping national and cultural identity, the pedagogical value of lacuna-focused activities, and the prospects for developing a comprehensive digital database of lacunae.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Bartminski, J. (2009). Aspects of cognitive ethnolinguistics. Equinox.

2.Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

3.Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

4.Dewaele, J.-M., & Petrides, K. V. (2011). Trait emotional intelligence and L2 motivation, attitudes, and ultimate attainment. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 222–240.

5.Fantini, A. E. (2009). Assessing intercultural competence: Issues and tools. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 456–476). SAGE.

6.Leontiev, A. A. (1997). Язык и речевая деятельность в общей и педагогической психологии. Московский психолого-социальный институт.

7.Markovina, I. Yu. (2012). Lacunae as cultural phenomena and their role in cross-cultural communication. Journal of Cultural Studies, 4(1), 45–67.

8.Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.

9.Stern, H. H. (1992). Issues and options in language teaching. Oxford University Press.

10.Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies — and beyond. John Benjamins.

11.Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford University Press.

12.Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-03

How to Cite

LACUNAE AND INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCE: PEDAGOGICAL IMPLICATIONS, COMPENSATION STRATEGIES, AND THE LINGUACULTURAL WORLDVIEW. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(5), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20008172

Similar Articles

11-20 of 3020

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.