MAIN DIRECTIONS OF SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS ON THE GLOBALIZATION OF THE WORLD ECONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
globalization, world economy, neoliberalism, world-systems theory, economic integration, international trade, capital flows, institutional economicsAbstract
Globalization of the world economy represents one of the most significant and complex phenomena of the contemporary era, reshaping the structure of international trade, capital flows, labor markets, and governance systems. This article examines the main directions of scientific concepts and theoretical frameworks that scholars have developed to understand and explain the processes of economic globalization. Through a systematic review of existing literature and theoretical models, this study identifies four principal conceptual directions: neoliberal integration theory, dependency and world-systems theory, institutionalist approaches, and heterodox perspectives emphasizing asymmetry and uneven development. The findings suggest that no single theoretical framework comprehensively captures the multidimensional character of globalization; rather, an integrative analytical approach is necessary. The article concludes that future research must account for emerging challenges such as deglobalization trends, digital transformation, and geopolitical fragmentation.Downloads
References
1. Amin, S. (1990). Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World. Zed Books.
2. Arrighi, G. (2010). The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times (2nd ed.). Verso.
3. Baldwin, R. (2022). The Globotics Upheaval: Globalization, Robotics, and the Future of Work. Oxford University Press.
4. Bhagwati, J. (2004). In Defense of Globalization. Oxford University Press.
5. Elson, D. (1994). Micro, meso, macro: Gender and economic analysis in the context of policy reform. In I. Bakker (Ed.), The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy (pp. 33–45). Zed Books.
6. Frank, A. G. (1978). Dependent Accumulation and Underdevelopment. Macmillan.
7. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (Eds.). (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press.
8. Milanovic, B. (2019). Capitalism, Alone: The Future of the System That Rules the World. Harvard University Press.
9. Palley, T. (2013). Financialization: The Economics and Politics of the Devil's Bargain. Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.
11. Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. W. W. Norton.
12. Rodrik, D. (2020). Why Does Globalization Fuel Populism? Economics, Culture, and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism. Annual Review of Economics, 13, 133–170.
13. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36(2), 379–415.
14. Sachs, J. D. (2005). The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities for Our Time. Penguin Press.
15. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton.
16. Stockhammer, E. (2016). Neoliberal growth models, monetary union and the Euro crisis: A post-Keynesian perspective. New Political Economy, 21(4), 365–379.
17. Storm, S. (2017). The new normal: Demand, secular stagnation, and the vanishing middle class. International Journal of Political Economy, 46(4), 169–210.
18. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. Academic Press.
19. Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press.
20. Wolf, M. (2004). Why Globalization Works. Yale University Press.
21. Young, B. (2003). Financial crises and social reproduction: Asia, Argentina and Brazil. In I. Bakker & S. Gill (Eds.), Power, Production and Social Reproduction (pp. 103–123). Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India