BARTH SYNDROME: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF CARDIOLIPIN METABOLISM, CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS, AND EMERGING THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Barth syndrome, tafazzin, cardiolipin, mitochondrial disorder, cardiomyopathy, neutropenia,Abstract
Barth syndrome (BTHS) is a rare, X-linked multi-system disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the TAFAZZIN gene, which encodes the mitochondrial enzyme tafazzin. This enzyme catalyses the remodelling of cardiolipin, a unique phospholipid essential for inner mitochondrial membrane structure and function. The clinical triad of cardiomyopathy, neutropenia, and skeletal myopathy, often accompanied by growth delay and 3-methylglutaconic aciduria, defines the syndrome's phenotypic spectrum. This review analyses the current understanding of Barth syndrome's molecular pathogenesis, from the fundamental defect in cardiolipin remodelling to the diverse mitochondrial dysfunctions that drive tissue-specific pathology. Diagnostic approaches now prioritise the monolysocardiolipin-to-cardiolipin ratio as a robust biochemical marker alongside molecular confirmation. Management remains largely supportive, encompassing cardiac surveillance, infection prevention, nutritional support, and multidisciplinary care. However, the therapeutic landscape is evolving rapidly, with elamipretide recently approved for muscle weakness and promising preclinical studies targeting novel pathways including ABHD18 inhibition and gene therapy. This review highlights how insights from yeast, Drosophila, zebrafish, and murine models have illuminated disease mechanisms and identified therapeutic targets, while emphasizing the critical need for continued research to address remaining questions about phenotypic variability, long-term outcomes, and optimal management strategies.
Downloads
References
1.Barth PG, Scholte HR, Berden JA, et al. An X-linked mitochondrial disease affecting cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle and neutrophil leucocytes. J Neurol Sci. 1983;62(1-3):327-355.
2.Lu YW, Claypool SM. Disorders of phospho lipid metabolism: an emerging class of mitochondrial disease due to defects in the cardiolipin biosynthetic pathway. J Lipid Res. 2015;56(8):1432-1446.
3.Bione S, D'Adamo P, Maestrini E, Gedeon AK, Bolhuis PA, Toniolo D. A novel X-linked gene, G4.5, is responsible for Barth syndrome. Nat Genet. 1996;12(4):385-389.
4.Schlame M, Towbin JA, Heerdt PM, Jehle R, DiMauro S, Blanck TJ. Deficiency of tetralinoleoyl-cardiolipin in Barth syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2002;51(5):634-637.
5.Ikon N, Ryan RO. Barth syndrome: connecting cardiolipin to cardiomyopathy. Lipids.2017;52(2):99-108.
6.Jefferies JL. Barth syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2013;163C(3):198-205.
7.Steward CG, Groves SJ, Taylor CT, et al. Neutropenia in Barth syndrome: characteristics, risks, and management. Curr Opin Hematol. 2019;26(1):6-15.
8.Thompson WR, DeCroes B, McLane M, et al. New targets for monitoring and therapy in Barth syndrome. Genet Med. 2016;18(10):1001-1010.
9.Clarke SL, Bowron A, Gonzalez IL, et al. Barth syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:23.
10.Miller PC, Ren M, Schlame M, Toth MJ, Phoon CKL. A Bayesian analysis to determine the prevalence of Barth syndrome in the pediatric population. J Pediatr. 2020;217:112-117.
11.Ferreira C, Pierre G, Thompson R, Vernon H. Barth Syndrome. 2020 Oct 1. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2025.
12.Johnston J, Kelley RI, Feigenbaum A, et al. Mutation characterization and genotype-phenotype correlation in Barth syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;61(5):1053-1058.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India