PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF METABOLIC SYNDROME: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN ADULT POPULATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, insulin resistance, obesity, dyslipidemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, risk factorsAbstract
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) represents a constellation of metabolic abnormalities that significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and all-cause mortality. This cross-sectional study aimed to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome in an adult population and identify associated risk factors. A total of 450 participants aged 30-70 years were recruited from primary healthcare centers and underwent comprehensive clinical and biochemical evaluation. MetS was diagnosed according to the harmonized criteria proposed by the International Diabetes Federation. The overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 34.7% (156/450), with significantly higher rates observed in participants aged ≥50 years (48.3% vs. 21.2%, p<0.001), females (38.2% vs. 31.1%, p=0.045), and those with sedentary lifestyle (42.8% vs. 23.6%, p<0.001). The most common components were abdominal obesity (68.6%), elevated triglycerides (52.4%), and reduced HDL-cholesterol (47.8%). Participants with MetS demonstrated significantly higher levels of inflammatory markers including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (median 3.8 mg/L vs. 1.2 mg/L, p<0.001) and insulin resistance as measured by HOMA-IR (median 4.2 vs. 1.8, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age ≥50 years (OR 3.24, 95% CI 2.12-4.95), physical inactivity (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.84-3.88), family history of diabetes (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.45-3.12), and current smoking (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.21-2.63) as independent predictors of metabolic syndrome. The high prevalence of metabolic syndrome in this population underscores the urgent need for targeted preventive interventions focusing on lifestyle modification, early detection, and comprehensive management strategies to reduce the burden of cardiovascular and metabolic complications.
Downloads
References
1.Alberti, K. G., Eckel, R. H., Grundy, S. M., Zimmet, P. Z., Cleeman, J. I., Donato, K. A., ... & International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention. (2009). Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation, 120(16), 1640-1645.
2.Eckel, R. H., Grundy, S. M., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2005). The metabolic syndrome. The Lancet, 365(9468), 1415-1428.
3.Saklayen, M. G. (2018). The global epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Current Hypertension Reports, 20(2), 1-8.
4.Mottillo, S., Filion, K. B., Genest, J., Joseph, L., Pilote, L., Poirier, P., ... & Eisenberg, M. J. (2010). The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 56(14), 1113-1132.
5.Grundy, S. M., Cleeman, J. I., Daniels, S. R., Donato, K. A., Eckel, R. H., Franklin, B. A., ... & Costa, F. (2005). Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation, 112(17), 2735-2752.
6.Rochlani, Y., Pothineni, N. V., Kovelamudi, S., & Mehta, J. L. (2017). Metabolic syndrome: pathophysiology, management, and modulation by natural compounds. Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, 11(8), 215-225.
7.McCracken, E., Monaghan, M., & Sreenivasan, S. (2018). Pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome. Clinics in Dermatology, 36(1), 14-20.
8.Fernández-Bergés, D., Cabrera de León, A., Sanz, H., Elosua, R., Guembe, M. J., Alzamora, M., ... & Marrugat, J. (2012). Metabolic syndrome in Spain: prevalence and coronary risk associated with harmonized definition and WHO proposal. DARIOS study. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 65(3), 241-248.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

