METHODS OF ASSEMBLING AND DISMANTLING RAIL JOINTS ON REINFORCED CONCRETE SLEEPERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
rail joint; reinforced concrete sleeper; fastening assembly; track dismantling; elastic clip; fishplate; railway maintenanceAbstract
Rail joint assembly and dismantling on reinforced concrete sleepers constitute a critical phase of track superstructure maintenance and construction. This paper examines the principal methods employed in assembling and dismantling rail connections, with particular focus on elastic clip fastenings (e-clip and Pandrol systems), insulated joints, and bolted fishplate connections used with prestressed concrete sleepers. A comparative field study was conducted on three operational track sections of the Uzbekistan Railways network between 2021 and 2023. Key performance indicators including assembly time, fastening torque consistency, joint gap tolerance, and post-dismantling component reusability were measured and analysed. Results indicate that mechanised assembly using hydraulic torque wrenches reduces installation time by 42% and improves torque consistency by 31% compared to manual methods. Elastic clip systems demonstrated a 28% higher reusability rate after dismantling versus conventional bolted joints. Standardised dismantling procedures significantly reduced component damage during removal. These findings provide evidence-based guidance for railway maintenance engineers seeking to optimise track assembly workflows and reduce life-cycle costs.
Downloads
References
1.Ferdous, W., Manalo, A., Van Erp, G., Aravinthan, T., & Kaewunruen, S. (2015). Composite railway sleepers – Recent developments, challenges and future prospects. Composite Structures, 134, 158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.058
2.Kaewunruen, S., & Remennikov, A. M. (2009). Progressive failure of prestressed concrete sleepers under multiple high-intensity impact loads. Engineering Structures, 31(10), 2460–2473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.06.008
3.Peters, K., & Müller, R. (2018). Mechanised track maintenance on high-speed lines: Productivity benchmarks and quality assessment. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 232(5), 1485–1496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409717730485
4.UIC Code 864-3. (2012). Technical specification for the supply of rail fastenings. International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris, France.
5.EN 13146-9:2011+A1:2013. (2013). Railway applications — Track — Test methods for fastening systems. Part 9: Determination of stiffness. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels.
6.Pandrol. (2020). Pandrol e-Clip Fastening System: Engineering Technical Manual (4th ed.). Pandrol Rail Fastenings Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
7.Esveld, C. (2001). Modern Railway Track (2nd ed.). MRT-Productions, Zaltbommel, The Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-800324-3-3.
8.Tashtemirova, N. A., & Nazarov, D. S. (2022). Economic analysis of track superstructure maintenance strategies on Uzbekistan Railways main corridors. Temir Yo'l Transporti, 18(2), 44–53.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India