TRANSPORT: TRENDS, EFFICIENCY, AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Railway transport, transport development, infrastructure modernization, transport efficiency, socio-economic impact, sustainable mobility.Abstract
Railway transport remains one of the most important components of modern transportation systems due to its high capacity, energy efficiency, and significant socio-economic impact. Over recent decades, the development of railway transport has been strongly influenced by technological innovation, infrastructure modernization, and the growing demand for sustainable mobility. This article analyzes key trends in the development of railway transport, focusing on efficiency improvements and socio-economic effects.
The study examines the role of high-speed rail networks, electrification, and digital technologies in enhancing operational performance and transport reliability. Special attention is given to the contribution of railway transport to economic growth, regional integration, employment, and environmental sustainability. A comparative analysis of international experiences demonstrates that investment in railway infrastructure leads to reduced transportation costs, improved connectivity, and increased competitiveness of national economies.
The findings indicate that railway transport offers significant advantages over other modes of transport in terms of energy efficiency, safety, and reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, the expansion of railway systems supports balanced regional development and promotes social inclusion by improving access to mobility. In conclusion, the article highlights that continued modernization and strategic investment in railway transport are essential for achieving long-term economic growth and sustainable development.
Downloads
References
1.Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80.
2.Campos, J., & de Rus, G. (2009). Some stylized facts about high-speed rail: A review of HSR experiences around the world. Transport Policy, 16(1), 19–28.
3.European Commission. (2018). Sustainable transport: A European strategy for low-emission mobility. Brussels.
4.Givoni, M., & Banister, D. (2013). Moving towards low carbon mobility. Edward Elgar Publishing.
5.International Energy Agency. (2019). The future of rail: Opportunities for energy and the environment. Paris: IEA.
6.International Union of Railways (UIC). (2020). High-speed rail: Fast track to sustainable mobility. Paris.
7.Litman, T. (2015). Evaluating transportation economic development impacts. World Transport Policy & Practice, 21(2), 1–17.
8.Nash, C. (2015). Rail transport policy. In Handbook of Transport Economics (pp. 153–173). Elsevier.
9.Preston, J. (2012). Integration for seamless transport. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper, 2012–01.
10.Rodrigue, J.-P., Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge.
11.Santos, G., Behrendt, H., & Teytelboym, A. (2010). Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 28(1), 46–91.
12.Schipper, L., Marie-Lilliu, C., & Gorham, R. (2000). Flexing the link between transport and greenhouse gas emissions. Transport Policy, 7(2), 125–139.
13.Vuchic, V. R. (2007). Urban transit systems and technology. John Wiley & Sons.
14.World Bank. (2021). Railway reform: Toolkit for improving rail sector performance. Washington, DC.
15.Zhao, J., Deng, W., & Song, Y. (2018). Ridership and service quality of high-speed rail. Transportation Research Part A, 109, 176–191.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India