INDIRECTNESS AND POLITENESS IN UZBEK POLITICAL JOURNALISM

Authors

  • Dilafruz Mirzahamdamova Language Instructor, Kokand University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

indirectness, politeness, political journalism, Uzbek media discourse, pragmatics, face-saving

Abstract

This study investigates the use of indirectness and politeness strategies in Uzbek political journalism from a pragmatic perspective. Political media discourse plays a crucial role in shaping public opinion, particularly in societies where sociocultural norms value respect, harmony, and face-saving communication. Drawing on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory and indirectness frameworks in pragmatics, this research analyzes how Uzbek journalists employ linguistic strategies to express criticism, evaluation, and ideological positioning without overt confrontation. Using a qualitative discourse-analytic approach, the study examines a corpus of political articles published in major Uzbek online news outlets between 2021 and 2024. The findings reveal that indirectness is systematically realized through modal constructions, passive voice, euphemisms, hedging devices, and culturally embedded expressions. These strategies function to mitigate face-threatening acts, maintain social harmony, and align journalistic discourse with national communicative norms. The study contributes to research in political discourse analysis, pragmatics, and translation studies by highlighting the culturally specific realization of politeness in Uzbek media and its implications for education, media literacy, and cross-cultural translation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Allanova, S. (2018). Cultural norms and communication strategies in Uzbekistan. Tashkent University Press.

2.Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(87)90011-5

3.Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085

4.Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. Manchester University Press.

5.Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.

6.Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages, and cultures. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199668434.001.0001

7.Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

8.House, J. (2015). Translation quality assessment: Past and present. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315747537

9.Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.74

10.Karimova, N. (2019). Linguistic strategies in Uzbek political media discourse. Journal of Central Asian Studies, 10(1), 55–72.

11.Kubrienė, L. (2017). Political discourse and impersonal constructions in post-Soviet media. Discourse & Communication, 11(5), 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481317721345

12.Mirzahamdamova, D. (2025). The Role of English as a Lingua Franca in Higher Education: Opportunities and Challenges. TLEP – International Journal of Multidiscipline, 2(4), 51-53. https://tlepub.org/index.php/1/article/view/201

13.Mirzahamdamova, D. (2025). Linguistic Landscapes in Urban Areas: Insights from English-Speaking Countries. TLEP – International Journal of Multidiscipline, 2(4), 58-61. https://www.tlepub.org/index.php/1/article/view/203

14.Mirzahamdamova, D. (2025). ENGLISH IN IMMIGRANT COMMUNITIES. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 1(4), 39–44. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/jasss/article/view/97263

15.Mirzahamdamova, D. (2025). Code-Switching in Bilingual Communities: Patterns and Implications. TLEP – International Journal of Multidiscipline, 2(4), 65-68. https://www.tlepub.org/index.php/1/article/view/205

16.Rasulov, D. (2020). Euphemism and hedging in Uzbek online news. Central Asian Linguistics Review, 5(2), 23–40.

17.TEACHING ENGLISH TO VISUALLY IMPAIRED STUDENTS. (2024). CONFERENCE ON THE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF SCIENCE IN THE MODERN WORLD, 1(10), 33-35. https://www.universalconference.us/universalconference/index.php/crismw/article/view/2985

18.van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

INDIRECTNESS AND POLITENESS IN UZBEK POLITICAL JOURNALISM. (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(01), 545-555. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

131-140 of 1483

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.