THE RELEVANCE OF BICORTICAL OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN MANDIBULAR ANGLE FRACTURES WITH FIXATION IN THE RETROMOLAR REGION
Main Article Content
Abstract
Mandibular angle fractures constitute a significant proportion of all mandibular fractures. According to international studies, preferred fixation techniques include a single miniplate along the superior border (51% of surgeons) and a combination of a plate with bicortical screws along the inferior border (13% of surgeons). Bicortical osteosynthesis in the retromolar region provides enhanced fixation rigidity by engaging both cortical layers of the bone. This paper examines the indications, surgical technique, advantages, and disadvantages of bicortical osteosynthesis in mandibular angle fractures.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1. Kuzieva, M., Akhmedova, M., & Khalilova, L. (2025). Modern aspects of choice of material for orthopedic treatment of patients in need of dental prosthetics. Modern Science and Research, 4(1), 322–333.
2. Kuzieva, M., Akhmedova, M., & Khalilova, L. (2025). Galvanosis and its diagnostic methods in the clinic of orthopedic dentistry. Modern Science and Research, 4(2), 203–212.
3. Kuzieva, M. A. (2023). Clinical and morphological criteria of oral cavity organs in the use of fixed orthopedic structures. Research Journal of Trauma and Disability Studies, 2(12), 318–324.
4. Abdusalimovna, K. M. (2024). The use of ceramic materials in orthopedic dentistry (Literature review). TADQIQOTLAR, 31(3), 75–85.
5. Abdusalimovna, K. M. (2024). Clinical and morphological features of the use of metal-free ceramic structures. Ta’lim va Innovatsion Tadqiqotlar, 13, 45–48.
6. Abdusalimovna, K. M. (2024). The advantage of using all-ceramic structures. Ta’lim va Innovatsion Tadqiqotlar, 13, 49–53.
7. Abdusalimovna, K. M. (2024). Clinical and morphological features of the use of non-removable orthopedic structures. Journal of Healthcare and Life Science Research, 3(5), 73–78.
8. Kuzieva, M. A. (2024). Carious inflammation in adolescents: Causes, features and prevention. European Journal of Modern Medicine and Practice, 4(11), 564–570.
9. Kuzieva, M. A. (2024). Malocclusion—Modern views, types and treatment. American Journal of Bioscience and Clinical Integrity, 1(10), 103–109.
10. Kuzieva, M. A. (2024). Modern aspects of morpho-functional data and treatment of age-related changes in the maxillofacial region. Valeology: International Journal of Medical Anthropology and Bioethics, 2(09), 126–131.