GREEN TAX POLICY AS A CATALYST FOR LOW-CARBON TRANSFORMATION: EVIDENCE, MECHANISMS, AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR EMERGING ECONOMIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Green tax policy; environmental taxation; low-carbon economy; green productivity; Uzbekistan; fiscal sustainabilityAbstract
Green tax policies have become a central instrument in fiscal environmental governance, aiming to internalize ecological externalities and redirect economic activity toward sustainable trajectories. This article investigates the role of green taxation in accelerating low-carbon transformation through productivity enhancement, investment reallocation, and technological upgrading. Drawing on international empirical evidence and macroeconomic data from emerging economies, the study examines how environmental taxation influences firm behavior, energy structure, and green total factor productivity. Particular attention is paid to policy transmission channels, efficiency trade-offs, and institutional preconditions. Using Uzbekistan as an illustrative case, the paper analyzes recent fiscal-environmental reforms and presents sector-level emission and tax revenue data. The findings indicate that green taxes are most effective when integrated with innovation incentives, financial instruments, and regulatory consistency. Policy recommendations emphasize adaptive tax design, monitoring mechanisms, and alignment with green finance frameworks to avoid investment distortions while maximizing environmental gains.
Downloads
References
1.Rahmi, N., Selvi, S., & Purwaningtias, A. S. (2024). Urgency and Impact of Green Taxes Implementation in Encouraging Green Business Post Covid-19. Majalah Ilmiah Bijak, 21(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.31334/bijak.v21i1.3636
2.Li, W., Hu, H., & Hong, Z. (2024). Green finance policy, ESG rating, and cost of debt——Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103051
3.Wu, T. (2024). Green finance reform policy increases corporate hypocritical business strategies: Evidence from the greenwashing behavior. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 29(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10162-0
4.Shafi, M., Ramos-Meza, C. S., Jain, V., Salman, A., Kamal, M., Shabbir, M. S., & Rehman, M. ur. (2023). The dynamic relationship between green tax incentives and environmental protection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 32184–32192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25482-y
5.Bobojonova, M. J. (2025). GREEN ECONOMY AND ITS DEVELOPMENT STATUS. SHOKH LIBRARY.
6.Bobojonova, M. J., & Naimova, N. A. (2024). A NEW FORM OF OUTSORCING IN ENSURING SELF-EMPLOYMENT OF THE POPULATION.
7. Jumayeva, Z. B., & Bobojonova, M. J. (2024). MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTION IN THE CONDITIONS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
8. Bobojonova, M. (2025). PRICES LEVELS IN THE GREEN ECONOMY AND THEIR APPLICATION. Journal of Applied Science and Social Science, 1 (1), 109-117.
9.Bobojonova, M. J. (2025). PROMISING WAYS OF SUSTAINABLE TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN THE POST-PANDEMIC PERIOD. ANALYSIS OF MODERN SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, 1 (4), 284-291.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India