THE PLACE OF THE MODESTY MAXIM AMONG OTHER POLITENESS MAXIMS

Authors

  • Shodiyeva Maftunabonu Adizovna PhD student, Assistant Teacher of Foreign Languages and Social Sciences Department, Asia International University, Bukhara, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

politeness principle, modesty maxim, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, self-presentation, Leech

Abstract

 The concept of politeness occupies a central position in pragmatic and sociolinguistic studies, serving as a key mechanism through which social harmony and interpersonal relations are maintained. Among various theoretical models, Geoffrey Leech’s Politeness Principle and its associated maxims have played a significant role in explaining how speakers manage social interaction through language. This article focuses on the modesty maxim, examining its place, function, and interaction with other politeness maxims such as tact, generosity, approbation, agreement, and sympathy. Through theoretical analysis and illustrative examples, the study argues that the modesty maxim functions as a mediating and identity-regulating principle that balances self-presentation and social expectations. The paper further demonstrates that while the modesty maxim is closely interconnected with other maxims, it possesses distinctive pragmatic and cultural significance, particularly in collectivist societies. The analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of politeness as a dynamic and context-dependent phenomenon rather than a fixed set of universal rules.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

2.Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge.

3.Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. Longman.

4.Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.

5.Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

6.Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Blackwell.

7.Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. Ballantine Books.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

THE PLACE OF THE MODESTY MAXIM AMONG OTHER POLITENESS MAXIMS. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(11), 2499-2501. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 210

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.