TASHKENT UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND PEDAGOGY

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: 2025-06-14
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55640/
Keywords:
Discourse analysis, Internet language, Pragmatics, Slang, Social media

Main Article Content

Rustamov Dastonjon Uktam ugli
A pragmatic analysis of slang in modern English (based on internet platforms)

Abstract

 This study investigates the pragmatic functions of slang in contemporary English as used on two major internet platforms: Twitter and Reddit. Drawing on qualitative data from 100 authentic online interactions, the research explores how slang operates beyond its lexical meaning to perform a range of context-sensitive communicative functions. Utilizing frameworks from Speech Act Theory, Grice’s Cooperative Principle, and Politeness Theory, the study identifies key pragmatic roles of slang, including expressing solidarity, managing face, performing humor and irony, and amplifying emotional stance. Findings reveal that users on both platforms strategically deploy slang to align socially with their audiences, negotiate disagreement, and enhance expressivity—often in ways shaped by platform-specific norms and affordances. The study highlights the importance of treating slang as a legitimate and dynamic resource in digital pragmatics and calls for broader, multimodal, and cross-cultural research to capture its evolving role in online communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 5 (2025): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

TASHKENT UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND PEDAGOGY. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(5), 490-498. https://doi.org/10.55640/

References

Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social media. Discourse, Context & Media, 4–5, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Bou-Franch, P., García-Gómez, A., & Pardo, A. (2019). Analyzing humor in online interaction: Multimodal and pragmatic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 141, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.006

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Bucholtz, M. (2009). From stance to style: Gender, interaction, and indexicality in Mexican immigrant youth slang. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 146–170). Oxford University Press.

Coleman, J. (2012). The life of slang. Oxford University Press.

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

Dynel, M. (2016). “I has seen it all!”: Towards an integration of Internet memes into the study of intertextuality, humor and inter-discursivity. Internet Pragmatics, 1(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00004.dyn

Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students. University of North Carolina Press.

Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Blackwell.

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet, 4(1). http://www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (2010). Interpersonal pragmatics: Issues and debates. In M. A. Locher & S. L. Graham (Eds.), Interpersonal pragmatics (pp. 1–13). De Gruyter Mouton.

Matthews, P. H. (2007). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 59–82). Academic Press.

Sharma, P., & Brookes, G. (2022). Memes, communities, and the pragmatics of belonging on Reddit. Discourse & Society, 33(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265211038877

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell.

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge.

Zappavigna, M. (2018). Searchable talk: Hashtags and social media metadiscourse. Bloomsbury.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.