COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTS OF SPEECH IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
comparative linguistics, parts of speech, English grammar, Uzbek grammar, morphology, syntax, typology, agglutination.Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative linguistic analysis of the classification and function of parts of speech in English and Uzbek. It aims to identify typological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic similarities and differences between the two languages. English, an analytic and inflectional language, primarily depends on word order and function words, whereas Uzbek, an agglutinative Turkic language, relies on affixation and suffixal morphology to express grammatical relations. Through the examination of descriptive and contrastive studies, the research highlights how each language categorizes words into grammatical and lexical classes, how these categories interact in sentence structure, and how linguistic typology influences teaching and translation. The study also underscores how different linguistic traditions—Western and Turkic—approach the concept of parts of speech. Findings reveal that, despite functional equivalences such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs, both languages differ significantly in morphological marking, category flexibility, and syntactic dependency. The implications are valuable for theoretical linguistics, contrastive grammar, and applied language studies.
Downloads
References
1.Biber D, Conrad S, Leech G. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2002.
2.Bozorov U. O‘zbek tili morfologiyasi: Nazariy asoslar. Tashkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti nashriyoti; 2015.
3.Comrie B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1989.
4.Crystal D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.
5.Dryer MS. Analytic vs. Synthetic Languages. In: Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, Comrie B, editors. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 110–3.
6.Ergashev D, Rasulov K. Hozirgi zamon o‘zbek adabiy tili. Morfologiya. Tashkent: Universitet nashriyoti; 2016.
7.Hasanov S. Qiyosiy tilshunoslik asoslari. Tashkent: Fan va texnologiya nashriyoti; 2020.
8.Huddleston R, Pullum GK. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
9.Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin; 1924.
10.Johanson L, Csató EA, editors. The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge; 1998.
11.Karimov A, Tursunov M. O‘zbek tili grammatikasi. Tashkent: Fan nashriyoti; 2010.
12.Motivation factors for students to learn English
SQE ADIBA KASIMOVA.New Renaissance international scientific journal 1 (10), 463-466
2024
13.Quirk R, Greenbaum S, Leech G, Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman; 1985.
14.Sharipov A. Til tipologiyasi va morfologik tizimlar. Samarkand: SamDU nashriyoti; 2021.
15.Trask RL. Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2007.
16.Yusupov R. O‘zbek va ingliz tillarining qiyosiy grammatikasi. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi nashriyoti; 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India