COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTS OF SPEECH IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Authors

  • Jurakulova Farzona Marat kizi, Saloyeva Mekhribon Asqadjonovna SAMARKAND STATE INSTITUTE OF foreign LANGUAGES STUDENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSLATION THEORY AND PRACTISE

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

comparative linguistics, parts of speech, English grammar, Uzbek grammar, morphology, syntax, typology, agglutination.

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparative linguistic analysis of the classification and function of parts of speech in English and Uzbek. It aims to identify typological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic similarities and differences between the two languages. English, an analytic and inflectional language, primarily depends on word order and function words, whereas Uzbek, an agglutinative Turkic language, relies on affixation and suffixal morphology to express grammatical relations. Through the examination of descriptive and contrastive studies, the research highlights how each language categorizes words into grammatical and lexical classes, how these categories interact in sentence structure, and how linguistic typology influences teaching and translation. The study also underscores how different linguistic traditions—Western and Turkic—approach the concept of parts of speech. Findings reveal that, despite functional equivalences such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, and adverbs, both languages differ significantly in morphological marking, category flexibility, and syntactic dependency. The implications are valuable for theoretical linguistics, contrastive grammar, and applied language studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Biber D, Conrad S, Leech G. Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2002.

2.Bozorov U. O‘zbek tili morfologiyasi: Nazariy asoslar. Tashkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy Universiteti nashriyoti; 2015.

3.Comrie B. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1989.

4.Crystal D. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2018.

5.Dryer MS. Analytic vs. Synthetic Languages. In: Haspelmath M, Dryer MS, Gil D, Comrie B, editors. The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 110–3.

6.Ergashev D, Rasulov K. Hozirgi zamon o‘zbek adabiy tili. Morfologiya. Tashkent: Universitet nashriyoti; 2016.

7.Hasanov S. Qiyosiy tilshunoslik asoslari. Tashkent: Fan va texnologiya nashriyoti; 2020.

8.Huddleston R, Pullum GK. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

9.Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin; 1924.

10.Johanson L, Csató EA, editors. The Turkic Languages. London: Routledge; 1998.

11.Karimov A, Tursunov M. O‘zbek tili grammatikasi. Tashkent: Fan nashriyoti; 2010.

12.Motivation factors for students to learn English

SQE ADIBA KASIMOVA.New Renaissance international scientific journal 1 (10), 463-466

2024

13.Quirk R, Greenbaum S, Leech G, Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman; 1985.

14.Sharipov A. Til tipologiyasi va morfologik tizimlar. Samarkand: SamDU nashriyoti; 2021.

15.Trask RL. Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2007.

16.Yusupov R. O‘zbek va ingliz tillarining qiyosiy grammatikasi. Tashkent: O‘qituvchi nashriyoti; 2018.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-07

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PARTS OF SPEECH IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(10), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

11-20 of 1520

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.