THE PHENOMENON OF IDIOMS AND INCOMPLETE SENTENCES IN MODERN LINGUISTICS

Authors

  • Ibragimova Muqaddas Teacher of SamSIFL Samarkand, Uzbekistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

word-speech, word-speech, incomplete speech, communicative-pragmatics, anthropogenicity, expressiveness, context, virtual communication, structural-semantic approach, functional-communicative analysis, pragmatic unity.

Abstract

This article analyzes the communicative-pragmatic and anthropogenic nature of idioms and incomplete sentences. In the study, idioms are organized as independent communicative units in the speech process, and incomplete sentences are organized as syntactic structures that acquire meaning in contextual relationships. Also, the anthropogenic properties of these units related to the human factor, their role in expressing the speaker's emotional state, expressive purpose and psychological impact in communication are revealed. The article analyzes the communicative-pragmatic functions of idioms and incomplete sentences in the role of information transmission, expression of emotional state, and increasing the effectiveness of communication. As a result, the common and different aspects of these two phenomena in the modern language system from the point of view of an anthropocentric approach are identified.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Bloomfield L. Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984. (1933). https://www.yumpu.com/en /document/read/ 11576293/language-bloomfield-leonard-1887-1949 pdf-rare-books-at

2. Warton T. Pragmatics and no-verbal communication. – Cambridge University Press, 2009. – Р.70. www.cambridge.org.

Jakobson, R. Linguistics and poetics: in Style in language. Edited by T. Sebeok. – Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960. 1960. – Р. 66-67.

3.Виноградов В.В. : Вопросы синтаксиса современного русского языка. М., 1950. С.38.

4.Ковалев Н.С. Особенности выявления «оценочности» в словах-предложениях и близких к ним по значению конструкциях // Известия Чеченского государственного педагогического института. – 2016. – Т. 9. – № 2 (14). –С. 74-79.

5.Лекант П. А. Современный русский язык (под ред. П. А. Леканта). – Москва: Дрофа, 2002. – С. 462-465.

6.Montes R.G. The development of discourse markers in Spanish: Interjections // Journal of Pragmatics 1999. –№ 31.– Р. 1289–1319.

7.А. М. Пешковский. Сборник статей, Госиздат, Л., 1925, стр. 100.

8.Пруссова О.В. Слова-предложения в современном немецком языке: диссертация ... кандидата филологических наук: 10.02.04.- Нижний Новгород, 2001.- 223 с.: ил. РГБ ОД, 61 01-10/872-0. –С. 179.

9.Попова И.А.Неполные предложения в совр.рус. яз.// Труды Института языкознания, т.2.М.,1953.[Электронный ресурс] - Режим доступа: http: //www. russofile.ru.C.5

10.Sapir E. Language. – New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1921. https://www.ugr.es/

11.Сковородников А.П. О критерии эллиптичности в русском синтаксисе //Вопросы языкознания. 1973. №3. - С. 114-123

12.Trask, R.L. A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. – London. Routledge, 1993.

13.O’Connell D.C., Kowal S., King S.P. Interjections in literary readings and artistic performance. Pragmatics,17. International Pragmatics Association, 2007. – P. 420.

14.Шахматов А.А. Синтаксис русского языка. Л., 1941.

15. Herder J.G. On the origin of language. In On the origin of language: Two essays. Translated by J.H.Moran, A. Gode. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London, 1966. – P. 88.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-06

How to Cite

THE PHENOMENON OF IDIOMS AND INCOMPLETE SENTENCES IN MODERN LINGUISTICS. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(10), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 3057

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.