TYPES OF DIGITAL DISCOURSE AND THEIR SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
digital discourse, online communication, pragmatics, multimodality, social media language, virtual interaction, linguistic features, discourse types, computer-mediated communication, language evolutionAbstract
Digital discourse has emerged as a significant area of study within modern linguistics, reflecting the rapid development of communication technologies and the transformation of language use in virtual environments. This article explores the main types of digital discourse and analyzes their distinctive features from a pragmatic and communicative perspective. The study classifies digital discourse into several categories, including social media discourse, online forums, instant messaging, blogs, and professional digital communication. Each type is examined in terms of its structural, functional, and stylistic characteristics. The research highlights that digital discourse is characterized by multimodality, interactivity, hybridity, and the blending of oral and written forms. It also emphasizes the role of context, user intention, and cultural factors in shaping meaning in digital communication. Special attention is given to linguistic phenomena such as abbreviations, emojis, code-switching, and informal syntax, which contribute to the uniqueness of digital interaction. The findings suggest that digital discourse not only reflects contemporary communication practices but also actively influences language evolution. Understanding its types and features is essential for advancing linguistic theory and improving digital literacy in educational contexts.
Downloads
References
1.Kress G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. – London: Routledge, 2019. – 212 p.
2.Van Leeuwen T. Multimodality and Discourse Analysis. – London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020. – 198 p.
3.Tagg C. Exploring Digital Communication: Language in Action. – London: Routledge, 2019. – 256 p.
4.Androutsopoulos J. Networked Multilingualism: Some Language Practices on the Internet // International Journal of Bilingualism. – 2017. – Vol. 21, № 3. – P. 340–360.
5.Georgakopoulou A. Small Stories Research in Social Media: Methods and Ethics // Journal of Pragmatics. – 2017. – Vol. 115. – P. 3–10.
6.Jones R. H., Chik A., Hafner C. A. Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Age. – London: Routledge, 2015. – 230 p.
7.Abduazizov A. A. Zamonaviy tilshunoslikda diskurs tahlili masalalari. – Toshkent: Fan, 2021. – 156 b.
8.Nurmonov A. N. Til va nutq tizimida zamonaviy yondashuvlar. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy universiteti nashriyoti, 2020. – 200 b.
9.Mahmudov N. M. Lingvopragmatika asoslari. – Toshkent: Fan va texnologiya, 2019. – 180 b.
10.Safarov Sh. S. Pragmatika va nutq tahlili. – Toshkent: Akademnashr, 2018. – 220 b.
11.Rasulov R. R. Internet tilining lingvistik xususiyatlari // Filologiya masalalari. – 2022. – № 3. – B. 45–52.
12.Yusupov O. O. Raqamli kommunikatsiya va til evolyutsiyasi // Zamonaviy lingvistika jurnali. – 2023. – № 1. – B. 60–68.
13.Karimov B. B. Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda nutq va uning xususiyatlari // Til va adabiyot ta’limi. – 2021. – № 4. – B. 25–30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
