RELIGIOUS DISCOURSE AS A RESEARCH CONSTRUCT
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article explores the classification and characteristics of discourse in modern linguistics, focusing on the distinctions between personal and institutional discourse and their respective subcategories. Particular attention is given to thematic and culturally specific discourses, including those rooted in religion. Language and religion are examined as interconnected systems of spiritual culture, with religious discourse analyzed through its various dimensions: doctrinal, cultic, and community-oriented. Strategies and functions of religious discourse, as identified by notable scholars, are discussed, including prayer, confession, affirmation, and ritual. Ultimately, the article underscores the profound influence of religious discourse on cultural, linguistic, and spiritual dimensions of human existence, highlighting its unique characteristics across different religions and its essential role in shaping the linguistic and cultural identity of societies.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1.Kubryakova, E. S. Language and knowledge: On the way to gaining knowledge about language: Parts of speech from a cognitive point of view. The role of language in understanding the world / E. S. Kubryakova. - M.: Languages of Slavic culture, 2004. - 560 p.
2.Kushneruk, S. L. "The world of discourse" in the aspect of cognitive modeling (Issues of discourse analysis) / S. L. Kushneruk // Issues of cognitive linguistics. - 2013. - No. 1. - P. 105-114.
3.Bobyreva, E. V. Religious discourse: values, genres, strategies (based on the Orthodox doctrine): author's abstract. dis. ... doctor of philological sciences: 10.02.19 / Bobyreva Ekaterina Valerievna. - Volgograd: Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 2007. - 42 p.
4.Stepanov, Yu. S. Alternative world, discourse, fact and principle of causality / Yu. S. Stepanov // Language and science of the late 20th century: collection of articles. - M.: Russian State Humanitarian University, 1995. - Pp. 35-72.
5.Sazonova, A. A. Ontology of the concept ARM in the sacred and profane spaces of the German language: author's abstract. diss. ... Cand. Philological Sciences: 10.02.04 / Sazonova Anna Andreevna. - Irkutsk, 2021. - 24 p.
6.Subxonova, M. (2022). The role of language and culture in the linguacultural analysis of English and Uzbek proverbs. CENTER FOR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (buxdu.Uz), 8(8). retrieved from https://journal.buxdu.uz/index.php/journals_buxdu/article/view/5895
7. Subxonova, M. (2023). DINIY DISKURSDA METAFORIK BIRLIKLAR TALQINI VA FUNKSIONALLIGI. Talqin Va Tadqiqotlar, 1(19). retrieved from http://talqinvatadqiqotlar.uz/index.php/tvt/article/view/137
8. Subxonova, M. (2022). LINGVOMADANIY BIRLIKLARNING DOSTLIK HAQIDAGI INGLIZ VA O'ZBEK MAQOLLARIDA IFODALANISHI. CENTER OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (buxdu.Uz), 23(23). retrieved from https://journal.buxdu.uz/index.php/journals_buxdu/article/view/8213
9.Otabekovna, S. M. (2023). METAPHORIC EXPRESSIONS IN DIFFERENT RELIGIOUS TEXTS. " ENGLAND " MODERN PSYCHOLOGY AND PEDAGOGY: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTION, 10(1).
10.Subxonova, M. (2024). BADIIY TARJIMADA DINIY DISKURS ELEMENTLARI. CENTER OF SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (buxdu.Uz), 49(49). retrieved from https://journal.buxdu.uz/index.php/journals_buxdu/article/view/12467
11. Madina Subkhonova. (2024). The Concept of Religious Discourse and Aspects of its Study in Linguistics. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 2(5), 493-496. https://doi.org/10.5281/
12. Otabekovna, S. M. (2022). Comparative Analysis of Proverbs and Sayings in English and Uzbek Expressing Youth and Senility. Pindus Journal of Culture, Literature, and ELT, 2(5), 114-119.
13. Subkhonova, M. (2024) METAPHORE AND LANGUAGE. https://worldlyjournals.com/index.php/wkc/issue/view/85. https://worldlyjournals.com/index.php/wkc/article/view/7775.
14. DICKENS'S UNIQUE STYLE. (2024). Western European Journal of Modern Experiments and Scientific Methods, 2(12), 118-120. https://westerneuropeanstudies.com/index.php/1/article/view/1922