FEEDBACK SUPPORT SYSTEMS: THE ORETICAL BASIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
feedback, support system, communication theory, cybernetics, pedagogical technologies.Abstract
This article analyzes the theoretical foundations of feedback support systems. The feedback process is considered as a means of enhancing efficiency in human-computer interaction, education, manufacturing, and service sectors. The paper examines the developmental stages of these systems, their scientific theories, and possibilities for integration with modern technologies. The theoretical foundations are studied in connection with cybernetics, communication theory, and pedagogical technologies. In addition, the importance of feedback systems in improving user experience and the principles of their effective operation are also highlighted.
Downloads
References
1.Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine . MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11810.001.0001
2.Shute, VJ (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78 (1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
3.Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
4.Sadler, DR (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18 (2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
5.Kluger, AN, & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119 (2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
6.Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43 (8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
7.Black, P., & Williams, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5 (1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
8.Nicol, DJ, & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31 (2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
9.Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28 (1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103
10.Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies . RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203304846
11.Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogical practice. Higher Education, 45 (4), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413
12.Boude, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Feedback in higher and professional education: Understanding it and doing it well . Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074336
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
