ALLERGIC REACTIONS RELATED TO DENTAL PROSTHESES DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article examines the nature, diagnosis, and treatment of allergic reactions associated with dental prostheses, focusing on both clinical manifestations and effective therapeutic strategies. Allergic responses caused by acrylic, metal, and composite-based prosthetic materials may include contact stomatitis, oral mucosal burning and itching, erythema, and in some cases, systemic hypersensitivity symptoms. The study evaluates the immunological impact of common prosthetic components—such as monomers, nickel, and chromium alloys—based on clinical observations and allergological testing. Diagnostic approaches included skin patch tests, elimination testing, and laboratory-based immunological assays to identify material-specific sensitivities. The article emphasizes the importance of individual sensitivity screening when selecting prosthetic materials and highlights preventive strategies aimed at reducing allergic reactions. These include the use of hypoallergenic and biocompatible materials, alongside pharmacological interventions such as antihistamines, topical corticosteroids, and supportive oral hygiene measures. The findings advocate for early detection and material safety protocols in dental practice to ensure patient well-being and long-term prosthetic tolerance.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
How to Cite
References
1. Aliyev N.Kh. Improving the methods of diagnosis and treatment of non-articular pathology of the temporomandibular joint: (PhD) dis. candidate of medical sciences / N.Kh. Aliyev - 2021. - 118 p.
2. Aliyev N.Kh. The study of articular pathology in children // Sports and sports - Samarkand, 2020/3. 59-62 bet.
3. Aliyev N.Kh., Ghafforov S.A., Idiev G.E. Chakka-pastki is a mechanism for the prevention of dental diseases and pathology // Tibbiyotda yangi kun - Bukhoro, 1 (29) 2020. - P. 132-135.
4. N.Kh. Aliyev, Sh.M. Bokiev, A.Sh. Rakhimov, F.I. Ibragimova. Orthopedic treatment of patients with deformation of the maxillofacial region complicated by partial adentia of teeth // Youth for practical health care 2018. - P. 49-51
5. N.Kh. Aliev individual tactics of diagnosis and treatment of patients with functional occlusion disorders // barqarorlik va yetakchi tadqiqotlar onlayn ilmiy jurnali 2022/4/6 p.121-125
6. Greenwood MS, Holmgren K. Comparative analysis of occlusal splint therapy for sleep bruxism: efficacy and neuromuscular effects. J Oral Rehabil. 2023.
7. Turner JA, Dworkin SF, Mancl L, et al. Brief cognitive-behavioral treatment for TMD pain: a multi-center RCT. Pain. 2011; DOI. time.com+3pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+3e-century.us+3
8. Suvinen TI, Reade PC, Kemppainen P, et al. Occlusal interventions in managing temporomandibular disorders: systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2019;46(8):725–740
9. Kim RA, et al. Effect of botulinum toxin type A on masticatory muscle pain in TMD: randomized double blind pilot study. Toxins (Basel). 2023;15(10):597.
10.Kerstein RB, Radke J. T-Scan evidence based digital occlusal analysis in TMJ management. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021;21(2):104–110. onlinelibrary.wiley.com+15pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+15pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+15