JUDICIAL POWER IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
Judiciary, rule of law, independence, justice, constitutional reform, human rights, judicial reform, Uzbekistan.Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive overview of the judicial power in the Republic of Uzbekistan, analyzing its constitutional basis, structure, principles, and modern reforms. It explores the evolution of the judiciary from the early years of independence to the present stage of modernization and digitalization. The study also evaluates the legal mechanisms ensuring judicial independence, transparency, and the protection of human rights in accordance with international standards. The research concludes that Uzbekistan’s judiciary is undergoing a transformative process aimed at consolidating the rule of law, enhancing institutional integrity, and aligning national legislation with global democratic practices.
References
1.Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2023). Tashkent: National Legislative Database.
2.Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Courts.” (2021, December 28). National Database of Legislation, No. 03/21/728/1188.
3.Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-6041 “On Measures to Further Improve the Judicial System.” (2020, October 7). Official Gazette of Uzbekistan.
4.Strategy of the Development of New Uzbekistan for 2022–2026. (2022). Tashkent: Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
5.United Nations. (1985). Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary. New York: United Nations General Assembly.
6.United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Rule of Law and Access to Justice in Uzbekistan. New York: UNDP Publications.
7.OSCE/ODIHR. (2023). Judicial Independence in Central Asia: Assessment Report. Warsaw: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
8.USAID. (2022). Rule of Law Partnership Project in Uzbekistan: Final Evaluation Report. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
9.Council of Europe. (2021). European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ): Report on European Judicial Systems. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
10.Venice Commission. (2020). Opinion on the Draft Law on the Judicial System and the Status of Judges in Uzbekistan. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
11.Human Rights Watch. (2022). Uzbekistan: Judicial Reforms and Human Rights Progress Report. New York: HRW Publications.
12.Freedom House. (2023). Nations in Transit: Uzbekistan Country Report. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
13.Transparency International. (2022). Corruption Perceptions Index 2022: Central Asia Focus. Berlin: Transparency International Secretariat.
14.Rakhimov, I. (2021). Judicial Reforms in Uzbekistan: Challenges and Perspectives. Central Asian Law Review, 4(2), 45–60.
15.Karimova, D. (2022). Modernization of the Judicial System in Uzbekistan: Toward International Standards. Journal of Comparative Law and Policy, 11(3), 78–95.
16.OECD. (2022). Governance and Rule of Law in Central Asia: Progress and Reforms. Paris: OECD Publishing.
17.UN Human Rights Council. (2023). Report on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights by Uzbekistan. Geneva: United Nations Office.
18.European Union Delegation to Uzbekistan. (2021). EU–Uzbekistan Cooperation in the Field of Judicial Reform. Brussels: European External Action Service.
19.World Bank. (2022). Enhancing Judicial Efficiency in Transition Economies: Uzbekistan Case Study. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
20.National Human Rights Centre of Uzbekistan. (2023). Annual Report on the State of Human Rights Protection in Uzbekistan. Tashkent: NHR Centre Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
