PEDAGOGY AND INNOVATIVE TEACHING METHODS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
pedagogy, innovation, teaching methods, interactive approaches, competence.Abstract
This article highlights the modern directions of pedagogy and the significance of innovative teaching methods. The use of interactive techniques, information and communication technologies, and creative approaches enhances students’ knowledge, skills, and abilities. Innovative methods not only improve the quality of education but also foster personal and social competencies. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating advanced approaches into the educational process.
References
1. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
2. Klapper, J. T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
3. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
4. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33347). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. 5. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 8143834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
6. Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 3413366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
7. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press. 8. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010). Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication, 60(3), 4133 439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x
9. Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 6713696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335
10. Sweeny, K., Melnyk, D., Miller, W., & Shepperd, J. A. (2010). Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Review of General Psychology, 14(4), 3403 353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
